Showing posts with label Church of Christ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Church of Christ. Show all posts

Wednesday, 11 October 2017

The Church of CHRIST

     What is the church of Christ? What do we mean when we talk about the church of Christ? What should we mean? It seems like many, even within the church itself, don’t have a clear understanding of what the church is, evidenced by the phraseology commonly used.
     Maybe you’ve heard something like, “He’s Baptist, she’s Methodist, I’m Church of Christ.” This gives the impression that the church of Christ is just a denominational sect among many others. Or, “John is a Church of Christ preacher, Freed-Hardeman is a Church of Christ university, and weekly communion is a Church of Christ doctrine.” But the expression “Church of Christ” is not an adjective. It would be more proper to speak of gospel preachers, Christian schools, and biblical doctrines. I’m a member of the church of Christ, but I’m not “Church of Christ.” The word “church” applies to a collectivity of believers, not to an individual. The designation “Church of Christ” is not a denominational label. It is not an adjective. It is a descriptive phrase for the church belonging to Christ.
     Sometimes the question is asked, “Will only the church of Christ be saved?” This is a valid question and deserves a biblical answer. When people derogatorily say, “The Church of Christ think they’re the only ones going to heaven,” they usually have in mind a denominational sect wearing the name “Church of Christ” who believe their denomination is better than all others. This misguided perspective has led to considerable misunderstanding and prejudice. Heres a good response: “You know, I’ve heard that rumor too. Would you like to see what the Bible says?”

A Biblical Response to Common Misconceptions

     The Bible teaches that salvation is in Christ (2 Tim. 2:10). In fact, salvation is only in Christ (Acts 4:12; John 14:6). How, then, does one get into Christ where salvation is available? There are only two verses in the Bible that specifically state at what point in our response to God we enter Christ, namely Rom. 6:3 and Gal. 3:27. Both of these passages say the same thing: as penitent believers we are “baptized into Christ.”1 Yet elsewhere Paul says, “we were all baptized into one body” (1 Cor. 12:13). Which is it? Are we baptized into Christ or into Christ’s body? If I swallow a coin, is the coin in me or in my body? Yes it is. To be in Christ is to be in the body of Christ.
     Does this mean that one must be in Christ’s body to be saved? Again Paul writes, “… Christ is head of the church; and He is the Savior of the body” (Eph. 5:23). Those outside the body of Christ are not and cannot be saved. And what is the emblematic body of Christ? “And He put all things under His feet, and gave Him to be head over all things to the church, which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all. (Eph. 1:22-23). The body of Christ is the church of Christ.
     The church of Christ is not a physical building or denominational sect. All penitent believers who have obeyed the gospel, having been baptized into Christ for the remission of sins, are added by the Lord to the church/the community of the saved (Acts 2:38-47; 1 Cor. 12:13), and by remaining faithful to Christ’s teachings, comprise the church of Christ. It’s not a matter of joining the church of your choice; it’s a matter of obeying the word of God and being the church of Christ’s choice.
     Will only the church of Christ be saved? The only biblical answer is affirmative. To give any other answer is to misunderstand what the church of Christ is. Someone might ask, “Do you think your church is the only right one?” This is an easy question to answer, because I don’t have a church. If I did, it wouldn’t be any better or worse than any other man-made religious group. But Jesus Christ does have a church. His church is the only right one. This is the only church I want to be part of.

Attempts to Justify Denominationalism

     In an attempt to justify the current state of the religious world, many try to define the church as a universal brotherhood of various (all, some, most?) denominational bodies, all wearing different names and adhering to different doctrines. But this concept is foreign to the Bible. When Jesus employed the imagery of the vine and the branches (John 15:1-18), there was no such thing as a denominational sect. In fact, the Lord’s own church had not been established yet. Jesus is the vine and individual disciples are the branches.
     Christ promised to build only one church (Matt. 16:18). By the time Paul wrote his letter to the Ephesians, there was just “one body” (Eph. 4:4a), just as there is one Spirit, one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and one God the Father (vv. 4b-6). As much as I’d like to rationalize the current condition of the religious world and affirm that everybody and everything is okay, this can’t be done if the Bible is to be taken seriously (cf. Matt. 7:13-14).

Whose church? Whose name?

     To be the church of Christ, the teachings of Christ must be respected and followed. If a group meets in a building with a sign that reads “Church of Christ” but are not abiding by Christ’s teachings, they are not the church of Christ. If a group meets in a building with no sign, or in a schoolroom, or in a living room, or in a cardboard shack, and the teachings of Christ are faithfully obeyed, they are the church of Christ.
     The church of the New Testament does not have a single, proper name – just descriptive designations (e.g. Rom. 16:16; 1 Cor. 11:16; 14:33; etc.). Nevertheless, there was only one church in the New Testament era, so irrespective of which biblical expression was used, there would be no confusion. In modern times, however, the religious environment is very different. There are hundreds of churches claiming allegiance to Christ, wearing different names, worshiping in different ways, and teaching conflicting doctrines. It can be very confusing. Therefore, it is surely expedient to have a designation that helps identify and unify those of like-precious-faith, while distinguishing from those on a different path.
     If Christ is the builder of his church (Matt. 16:18), the foundation of his church (1 Cor. 3:11), the purchaser of his church (Acts 20:28), and the head of his church (Col. 1:18), why shouldn’t we wear his name? When we speak of the church of Christ, it ought to be for the purpose of honoring Christ and identifying ourselves with him. Any other usage is unbiblical.

Putting it in Perspective

     If the Lord says there is only one true church (Matt. 16:18), am I narrow-minded if I say the same thing? If Jesus promises, “you shall know the truth” (John 8:32), is it arrogant to say that I know the truth? If the name of Christ has been exalted above all other names (Phil. 2:9), am I sectarian if I only want to wear the name of Christ? If God condemns religious division (1 Cor. 1:10), how can I justify denominationalism? If Jesus is the savior of all who obey him (Heb. 5:9), am I legalistic if I emphasize the importance of obedience? If God specifies the kind of worship that is acceptable to him (John 4:24), who am I to prescribe something different? If human innovations in worship are unacceptable to God (Matt. 15:8-9), am I judgmental when I object to human innovations in worship? If we speak where the Bible speaks (1 Pet. 4:11), why are we ridiculed for trying to follow the revealed will of God?

Conclusion

     I only want to be a member of the church I read about in the New Testament: nothing more, nothing less, and nothing else. If, for whatever reason, I’m not a member of that church, the greatest service anyone could do for me is to open the Bible and point me in the right direction. At the same time, I sincerely want others to be in heaven. If that means I have to step out of my comfort zone and lovingly confront those who are in error, am I not doing what the Lord expects? And a servant of the Lord must not quarrel but be gentle to all, able to teach, patient, in humility correcting those who are in opposition, if God perhaps will grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth” (2 Tim. 2:24-25).
--Kevin L. Moore

Endnote:
     1 Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are from the NKJV.


Related articles: Wayne Jackson's The Indestructible Church of Christ, Patrick Swayne's I am a Member of the Church of Christ, and Why the Little c Matters

Image credit: Photo taken by Lynne Moore of the sign on the building where the church of Christ in Nazareth meets.

Saturday, 7 September 2013

Questions About Music in Christian Worship (Part 3 of 3)


Q: Isn’t singing without mechanical instruments just a “Church of Christ” tradition?
         The word “tradition” simply refers to something that is passed down, whether from God to man through His word (1 Cor. 11:2, 23) or from man to man through subjective preferences (Matt. 15:1-9). Is singing praises to God without musical accompaniment, as practiced by modern-day churches of Christ, based on biblical tradition or human tradition? Singing without musical instruments in Christian worship can be traced back to the NT itself, continuing on through the first several hundred years of church history. Singing with musical accompaniment in Christian worship can only be traced back to the Roman Catholic Church no earlier than the 7th-century AD and to Protestant denominations of the 19th-century AD. Which practice is based on human tradition?
Q: Does the Greek word psallô in Eph. 5:19 mean to pluck the strings of an instrument?
     If it does, then every Christian is required to play a stringed instrument while singing -- an assertion no one will make. The meaning of the Greek word psallô has undergone a number of changes through the centuries. Long before the NT was written, psallô meant “to pluck off” or “pull out,” e.g. the hair (J. H. Thayer, Greek-English Lexicon 675). Then it came to signify “to cause to vibrate by touching, to twang,” e.g. a carpenter’s line; then “to touch or strike the chord, to twang the strings,” e.g. of a stringed instrument (ibid.). What should concern us, however, is the meaning of psallô when the NT was written. Thayer says, “in the N.T. to sing a hymn, to celebrate the praises of God in song” (ibid.). After noting the original non-musical sense of the word, the Greek-English Lexicon of Bauer, Arndt, Gingrich and Danker has this to say: “In the LXX [Greek translation of the OT] ps[allô] freq. means ‘sing’, whether to the accompaniment of a harp or (as usually) not . . . . This process continued until ps[allô] in Mod. Gk. means ‘sing’ exclusively; cf. psaltês = singer, chanter, w[ith] no ref[erence] to instrumental accompaniment” (891). When Paul wrote Rom. 15:9, 1 Cor. 14:15, and Eph. 5:19, and when James wrote Jas. 5:13, the word psallô simply meant to “sing, sing praise” (ibid.). Moreover, even if the word psallô still carried the idea of “pluck,” “strike,” or “twang,” the NT never uses “on stringed instruments” as the object of this verb, but rather “in/with your heart” (Eph. 5:19). The instrument with which Christians are enjoined to “make melody” (psallô), while singing in worship, is the God-created human heart, not a man-made mechanical instrument.
Q: Does 2 Chronicles 29:25 indicate that the use of musical instruments in worship was according to divine decree?
     Even if it does, remember this pronouncement was enjoined on ancient Israel and has nothing to do with Christian activity. Nevertheless, what does this passage actually say? “Then he [Hezekiah] stationed the Levites in the house of the Lord with cymbals, with stringed instruments, and with harps, according to the commandment of David, of Gad the king’s seer, and of Nathan the prophet; for thus was the commandment of the Lord by his prophets.” Notice that there are two actions being considered for which there were two different commands: (1) the Levites stationed in the temple was according to the commandment of the Lord (cf. Deut. 10:8); (2) the use of musical instruments was according to the commandment of David and his cohorts (cf. 1 Chron. 15:16; 23:5). Whether or not the latter was done with divine approval is a moot point as far as NT Christians are concerned. However, the Lord’s condemnation of Israel’s luxury and revelry in Amos 6:1-5 included their use of musical instruments “like David,” bringing into question the Lord’s supposed sanction of this practice.
--Kevin L. Moore

Related posts: Music & the Bible HistoryQuestions About Music 1Questions About Music 2

Image credit: http://saviochs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/music-clipartMUSIC1.jpg