Wednesday, 25 March 2026

The Key to Rightly Discerning the Message of Romans

Our modern-day religious environment has been heavily influenced by the 16th-century Calvinistic tenets of Reformed Theology and Martin Luther’s abbreviated gospel of sola fide (“faith alone”), creating an interpretive framework through which Paul’s writings are still widely scrutinized. Romans has thus been exploited over the centuries to address questions it was not designed to answer.

If we examine the text through first-century (pre-denominational) lenses, and seek to comprehend what the inspired author intended to communicate to his original targeted audience and how they would have understood the message in light of their particular background and circumstances, we are better equipped to avoid anachronistic misconceptions and make legitimate present-day application.


The Key to Understanding Romans


The best way to understand Romans is to start at the first verse of the first chapter and read all the way through to the end of the letter, which is how the document was originally designed. Otherwise, we run the risk of missing the point and misunderstanding any given passage, especially when the flow of thought and surrounding context are not considered.


Keys to Misunderstanding Romans


If we start in chapter 3 or 4 and conclude that justification is by faith alone apart from any kind of works or deeds, we have skipped over what was already established at the beginning of the letter (and reiterated at the end of the letter) concerning “obedience of faith” (1:5; 16:26). These bookends define how “faith” is to be understood throughout the book. Saving faith is not an inactive, non-obedient, purely mental assent to a perceived truth. It is clearly a functioning, responsive, obedient faith.1 We also miss what is laid out in chapter 2 about repentance and divine judgment according to our deeds, with repeated emphasis on active doing (2:4-16).


If we begin in the fifth chapter and dismiss from God’s redemptive plan obedience in general and baptism in particular, not only have we sidestepped the first two chapters, we also haven’t read far enough to appreciate that Paul is writing to penitent baptized believers who have been freed from sin as a result of their obedient faith (6:3-18), with continued righteous living (6:19-23). Likewise, if we start in chapter 6, we fail to fully comprehend the previous chapter’s focus on God’s loving grace and Christ’s atoning sacrifice, without which our faith response would be entirely ineffectual.


If we start in chapter 7, it would be easy to get discouraged by the blunt reminder of the inner struggle and constant battle to overcome sin, unless we are reminded of what the Lord has done in the preceding chapter. And we need to keep reading through chapter 8 to realize that divine help is available to ensure victory. But if we begin in the eighth chapter, we miss the personal effort described in chapter 7 that is necessary to work in cooperation with God to successfully live the Christian life.


If we start in the ninth chapter and isolate selected verses that seem to support certain tenets of Calvinism, we have overlooked the first eight chapters and may not realize that chapter 9 is merely prefatory for the extended three-chapter discourse about Israel’s place in salvation history. Chapters 10–11 clarify and complete the whole argument.


If we begin in the tenth chapter and cite verses 9-13 to argue against the necessity of gospel obedience and the salvific role of baptism, we have ignored the fact that the tenth chapter was written after the first eight chapters and is addressed to penitent baptized believers currently sanctified in Christ. Chapter 10 must therefore be read in light of what is already understood. By starting in chapter 11, we might unnecessarily infer the unconditional salvation of modern-day Israel, but again this misses everything Paul has been saying since the beginning of the letter about the conditional nature of salvation for all who are in Christ, Jews and Gentiles alike (e.g., 2:5-9; 3:23-26; 6:16-19; 10:12-13; 11:20-23).


If we begin in chapter 12, 13, 14, or 15, we skip over the theological foundation upon which the letter’s practical-application section stands. And by starting in the final chapter, we can certainly glean a lot of historical information but miss out on the doctrinal and practical aspects of the letter.


Conclusion


Briefly stated, Romans is about God’s redemptive plan for humanity. Both Jews and Gentiles have sinned, stand before God on equal terms, and are justified together in the same way (chaps. 1–11). Practical directives are then given for how Christians ought to live and relate to one another and to the world (chaps. 12–16).


Understanding Romans doesn’t have to be as daunting as many have made it out to be. It requires integrity, common sense, and conscientiously avoiding hermeneutical fallacies. Surely we can recognize the delusion of proof texting, i.e., selecting isolated verses to form a doctrinal belief without due attention to the original context, ignoring qualifying information, and thereby distorting the actual meaning. This is often accompanied by eisegesis, whereby one’s presuppositions are read into the biblical text, rather than exegesis, which draws out of the text what the inspired writer intended to convey.


Let us be thankful for the knowledge of God’s will as revealed in Romans and the rest of God’s holy word,2 and the opportunity and ability he has granted to study, understand, and obey it. May we live up to his expectations.


--Kevin L. Moore


Endnotes:

     1 See “Bookends of Romans,” Moore Perspective (16 Nov. 2023), <Link>. The so-called “Romans Road to Salvation” (popular in a number of denominational tracts) cherry-picks selected verses from Romans to create a seemingly biblical case for salvation by faith alone, but in so doing context is ignored and allusions to obedience and baptism (e.g., Rom. 1:5; 2:8; 6:1-18; 10:16; 16:19, 26) are curiously omitted.

     2 See “What the Scriptures Say About the Scriptures,” Moore Perspective (25 July 2018), <Link>.


Related PostsFaith and Works: Rom 2-4Abbreviated GospelPaul's Use of the OT in Romans


Related articles:

 

Image credit: https://www.learnreligions.com/how-to-study-the-bible-700238 

Wednesday, 18 March 2026

Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans

More scripture citations are found in Paul’s letter to the Romans than in all the rest of his writings combined.1 The apostle clearly assumed that the saints in mid-first-century Rome were well acquainted with and highly regarded the sacred writings of the Old Testament.

Discerning OT Use in the NT


There is no consensus among biblical scholars about how to identify and categorize the varied uses of OT passages in the NT. With some degree of ambiguity, analysts speak of citations, quotations, paraphrases, allusions, verbal parallels, thematic echoes, and recollections. Quotations can be subcategorized as direct quotes, loose or paraphrastic quotes, formulaic citations (with an introductory statement), and informal citations (without an introductory statement). Adding to the confusion and the inconsistency of proposed classifications are the varying ways in which a number of biblical texts have been employed, merging into multiple categories.2


For our purposes, keeping it simple, the identifying labels are limited to “quotes” (whether direct, loose, paraphrase, etc.) and “allusions” (whether echoes, parallels, recollections, summaries, etc.). There are potentially up to sixty-eight OT quotes and twenty-one OT allusions in Romans.


Use of the OT in Romans


The highest concentration is in chapters 9–11, where Paul addresses Israel’s place in salvation history: fourteen citations in chapter 9, eleven in chapter 10, twelve in chapter 11, for a combined total of thirty-seven. A disproportionate number also occurs in chapter 3, with eleven citations, providing the biblical framework for Paul’s explanation of how God makes people righteous. There are no scripture references in chapters 6 and 16, and only one apparent allusion in chapter 5.


In Romans Paul borrows from nineteen OT books: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, 2 Chronicles, Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Joel, Nahum, Habakkuk, Malachi. Heaviest usage comes from Isaiah, Psalms, and Deuteronomy.3 The scripture references below are numbered according to the English Bible.


Romans text

OT reference

form

Rom. 1:17

Habakkuk 2:4b

quote

Rom. 1:23

Psalm 106:20

allusion

Rom. 2:6

Psalm 62:12/Proverbs 24:12

quote

Rom. 2:11

2 Chronicles 19:7

allusion

Rom. 2:24

Isaiah 52:5

allusion

Rom. 2:24

Ezekiel 36:20-23?

allusion

Rom. 3:4a

Psalm 116:11

allusion

Rom. 3:4b

Psalm 51:4

quote

Rom. 3:10

Ecclesiastes 7:20

allusion

Rom. 3:10-12

Psalm 14:1-3/53:1-3

quote

Rom. 3:13

Psalm 5:9

quote

Rom. 3:13

Psalm 140:3

quote

Rom. 3:14

Psalm 10:7

quote

Rom. 3:15

Proverbs 1:16

quote

Rom. 3:15-17

Isaiah 59:7-8

quote

Rom. 3:18

Psalm 36:1

quote

Rom. 3:20

Psalm 143:2

allusion

Rom. 4:3

Genesis 15:6

quote

Rom. 4:7-8

Psalm 32:1-2

quote

Rom. 4:9

Genesis 15:6

quote

Rom. 4:11

Genesis 17:10-11

allusion

Rom. 4:17

Genesis 17:5

quote

Rom. 4:18

Genesis 15:5b

quote

Rom. 4:22

Genesis 15:6b

quote

Rom. 4:25

Isaiah 53:4-5

allusion

Rom. 5:12

Genesis 2:17; 3:19

allusion

Rom. 7:2-3

Deuteronomy 22:22

allusion

Rom. 7:7

Exodus 20:17

quote

Rom. 7:11

Genesis 3:13

allusion

Rom. 8:33

Isaiah 50:8-9

allusion

Rom. 8:34

Psalm 110:1; Isaiah 53:12

allusion

Rom. 8:36

Psalm 44:22

quote

Rom. 9:7

Genesis 21:12

quote

Rom. 9:9

Genesis 18:10, 14

quote

Rom. 9:12

Genesis 25:23

quote

Rom. 9:13

Malachi 1:2-3

quote

Rom. 9:15

Exodus 33:19

quote

Rom. 9:17

Exodus 9:16

quote

Rom. 9:20

Isaiah 29:16; 45:9

allusion

Rom. 9:25

Hosea 2:23

quote

Rom. 9:26

Hosea 1:10

quote

Rom. 9:27-28

Isaiah 10:22-23

quote

Rom. 9:28

Isaiah 28:22

allusion

Rom. 9:29

Isaiah 1:9

quote

Rom. 9:33

Isaiah 8:14; 28:16

quote

Rom. 10:5

Leviticus 18:5

quote

Rom. 10:6-8

Deuteronomy 9:4a; 30:12-14

quote 

Rom. 10:11

Isaiah 28:16

quote

Rom. 10:13

Joel 2:32

quote

Rom. 10:15

Isaiah 52:7; Nahum 1:15

quote

Rom. 10:16

Isaiah 53:1a

quote

Rom. 10:18

Psalm 19:4

quote

Rom. 10:19

Deuteronomy 32:21

quote

Rom. 10:20

Isaiah 65:1

quote

Rom.10:21

Isaiah 65:2

quote

Rom. 11:1-2

Psalm 94:14; 1 Samuel 12:22

allusion

Rom. 11:3

1 Kings 19:10, 14

quote

Rom. 11:4

1 Kings 19:18

quote

Rom. 11:8

Deuteronomy 29:4

quote

Rom. 11:8

Isaiah 29:10

quote

Rom. 11:9-10

Psalm 69:22-23

quote

Rom. 11:11

Deuteronomy 32:21

allusion

Rom. 11:26-27

Isaiah 59:20-21 (Psalm 14:7; 53:6)

quote

Rom. 11:34-35

Isaiah 40:13

quote

Rom. 11:34-35

Job 41:11

quote

Rom. 12:16-17

Proverbs 3:4, 7

allusion

Rom. 12:19

Leviticus 19:18a

allusion

Rom. 12:19

Deuteronomy 32:35

quote

Rom. 12:20

Proverbs 25:21-22

quote

Rom. 13:9

Exodus 20:13-17; Deut. 5:17-21; Lev. 19:18

quote

Rom. 14:11

Isaiah 45:23

quote

Rom. 14:13

Leviticus 19:14

allusion

Rom. 15:3

Psalm 69:9

quote

Rom. 15:9

2 Samuel 22:50; Psalm 18:49

quote

Rom. 15:10

Deuteronomy 32:43

quote

Rom. 15:11

Psalm 117:1

quote

Rom. 15:12

Isaiah 11:10

quote

Rom. 15:21

Isaiah 52:15

quote


Conclusion


Paul’s prolific use of the perfect passive indicative formula γέγραπται (“it is written”)4 consistently refers to the sacred writings having been recorded in the past with current and ongoing applicability. “For whatever was formerly written was written for our instruction, so that through the perseverance and through the encouragement of the scriptures we may have hope” (Rom. 15:4). Although no longer binding as a set of ordinances and rituals (Rom. 6:14; 7:4), these OT writings are holy, just, and good (Rom. 7:12) and remain historically, prophetically, and instructionally useful.


As “a living voice,”5 the scriptures, “according to Paul, are nothing other than God speaking to his people in the present through his words of judgment and salvation to Israel in the past.”6 May we have the same conviction, reverence, and reliance on God’s inspired word as Paul has demonstrated in Romans.


--Kevin L. Moore


Endnotes:

     1 Beyond Romans, the most OT citations in the NT are in Matthew, Acts, and Hebrews respectively. Notwithstanding possible allusions and verbal parallels, there are no OT quotations in Philippians, Colossians, 1-2 Thessalonians, Titus, Philemon, 1-3 John, Jude, and Revelation. See Terry Enns, “Romans: the Most OT Book in the NT,” Words of Grace (13 May 2015), <Link>.

     2 See Douglas S. Huffman, Understanding the New Testament Use of the Old Testament: Forms, Features, Framings, and Functions (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2024) 25-43.

     3 The quotations vary according to (a) agreement with the LXX and Hebrew text (3:13; 4:17, 18; 7:7; 8:36; 9:7, 12, 15; 10:13; 13:9; 15:3); (b) agreement with the LXX against the Hebrew text (4:3, 7-8; 9:29; 10:16, 21; 12:20; 15:10, 21); (c) agreement with the Hebrew text against the LXX (11:35); (d) at variance with both where they agree (3:4, 10-12, 18; 9:13, 25; 10:5, 19; 11:3, 8; 15:9, 11); (e) at variance with both where they vary (1:17; 2:24; 3:14-17; 9:9, 17, 26-28, 33; 10:6-8, 11, 15, 20; 11:4, 9-10, 26-27, 34; 12:19; 14:11; 15:12). See E. Earle Ellis, Paul’s Use of the OT (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1991) 150-54.

     4 Rom. 1:17; 2:24; 3:4, 10; 4:17; 8:36; 9:13, 33; 10:15; 11:8, 26; 12:19; 14:11; 15:3, 9, 21. Scripture citations are the author’s own translation.

     5 Richard B. Hays, “Three Dramatic Roles: The Law in Romans 3–4,” in James D. G. Dunn, ed. Paul and the Mosaic Law (Grand Rapids; Cambridge: Eerdmans, 1996) 161.

     6 Mark A. Seifrid, “Romans,” in Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, eds. G. K. Beale and D. A. Carson (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007) 608.


Related PostsWhat the Scriptures Say About the ScripturesKey to Understanding Romans 


Related articles:

 

Image credit: https://bcooper.ca/2025/03/25/the-struggle-within-a-study-of-romans-715-20/