Tuesday, 29 September 2020

Who Were the Antediluvian Nephilim?

In Genesis 6:1-4, prior to the Flood of Noah’s day, did heavenly or fallen angels cohabit with women on earth to produce an angelic-human hybrid race of giants?

This passage was originally written in the Hebrew language, and the precise meaning of the Hebrew term nephilim is unclear. Some English translators have rendered the word “giants” (GNT, N/KJV), probably influenced by the LXX and the Latin Vulgate. Most other English versions simply transliterate the term, “the Nephilim.” 

In the broader context, the lineage of Adam is traced through his sons Cain and Seth (Gen. 4:16–5:32). The development of godless civilization emanates from Cain, who “went out from the presence of Yahweh …” (4:16), compared to Seth and his progeny who “began to call on the name of Yahweh” (4:26).1


In chap. 6 the “men” and the “daughters of men” are contrasted with the “sons of God” (vv. 1-2). Nothing is said here about angels or other spirit beings. In fact, Jesus alludes to “those before the flood … marrying and giving in marriage” (Matt. 24:38), while also affirming that angels do not marry (Matt. 22:30; Mark 12:25). In view of the future resurrection and in contrast to the “sons of this age,” the Lord compares angels, who are not subject to death, to “sons of the resurrection” who are also called “sons of God” (Luke 20:34-36). 


In the ancient Near East the word “son” was commonly used to describe one’s character, disposition, nature, or conduct (e.g. Judg. 19:22; 1 Sam. 2:12; Psa. 29:1; 89:6, 22; Isa. 57:3; Mark 3:17; John 8:33; Acts 13:10). The righteous people of God are therefore “sons of God” (Matt. 5:9; Rom. 8:14, 19; 9:26; Gal. 3:26; 4:6)


In the context of Genesis 6, the “sons of God” appear to be the godly descendants of Seth, while the “men” and their “daughters” are the worldly (godless) descendants of Cain. In a patriarchal society, where males are dominant and in control, marriage is typically initiated by the males (cf. Gen. 4:19; 6:18; Ezra 9:2, 12; Neh. 10:30; etc.). The otherwise righteous “sons of God” made the foolish choice of seeking wives among the godless “daughters of men” (cp. Deut. 7:3-4; 1 Kings 11:1-4), whose offspring became mighty, valiant men of renown (Gen. 6:4b).


The nephilim (v. 4a) are not said to have been the offspring of anyone in particular. Rather, they were already existing “in those days” before the sons of God took wives among the daughters of men. Adam, through multiple other children (Gen. 5:4), had more descendants than just those of Cain and Seth. 


The word nephilim here is probably descriptive of a violent, tyrannical, oppressive people,presumably of imposing stature and strength (cp. Num. 13:33). When the Sethite sons of God and the Cainite daughters of men reproduced, their offspring were more refined than the nephilim but apparently got caught up in their wicked ways. “And Yahweh saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth …” (Gen. 6:5), eventually bringing about the global flood (vv. 7ff.). 


The long-held belief that angelic beings mated with earthly women, producing a race of superhuman giants, is based more on imaginative misinterpretation than solid biblical exegesis. The overarching lesson here is the spiritual danger and devastating consequences of the righteous people of God flirting with and commingling with those uncommitted to the loftier ways of the Lord (cf. Gen. 24:3; 28:1; 2 Cor. 6:14-18). 


--Kevin L. Moore


Endnotes:

     1 Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are the author’s own translation.

     2 Fred R. Coulter’s A Faithful Version renders the word “tyrants,” while Young’s Literal Translation reads “the fallen ones.”

 

Related PostsHow Are All Christians "Sons" of God?Premarital DecisionsHam's Sin & Curse

 

Image credit: https://soundcloud.com/tinfoilhatwithsamtripoli/258-the-nephilim-bigfoot-ufos-and-satanist-with-tony-merkel

5 comments:

  1. Always enjoy reading your posts Kevin. I always learn something when I read them. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you Chucho. Glad somebody's reading!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the insight! I appreciate the arguments you put forth.

    I'd be interested to hear your interpretation of Jude 6&7 and 2 Peter 2:4-6. Besides the angelic reading of Genesis 6 I am unaware of any time in the Bible that angel's, plural, could be read as "sinning".

    I'd appreciate your thoughts on the question.

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Bible was written for and primarily about God’s human creation, therefore information about his angelic creation is minimal. We know God created all things (1 Cor. 8:6), which would include free-will spirit beings, and everything he made was good (Gen. 1:31). But some of his creation has rebelled against him, including the devil (1 Tim. 3:6) and the angels who sinned (2 Pet. 2:4). While scripture does not clearly link these so-called fallen angels with the devil’s angels (Matt. 25:41), this presupposition seems reasonable.
      Peter simply states the fact of God’s judgment of angels who sinned (2 Pet. 2:4) but gives no further information. This is simply one of three examples he points to affirming the assurance that false teachers will likewise face divine judgment. Jude (v. 6) uses the same example to illustrate the destiny of ungodly men who were causing problems in the church.
      Anything else we might want the Bible to say about the subject is only speculation.

      Delete
  4. I realy appreciate you taking the time to give such a well thought out response. I definitely agree that the main purpose of the Bible isn't to tell us about his angelic creation.

    Thansk again for the response

    ReplyDelete