Noah was the great-great-great-great
granddaughter of the patriarch Joseph. Her sisters were Mahlah, Hoglah, Milcah,
and Tirzah. They were the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son
of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, the son of Joseph (Num.
26:28-33).
Background
After four decades of living as nomads in
the Sinai wilderness, it was time for the people of Israel to settle in the
land of Canaan.1 The fertile region was to be divided among all Israelite
tribes except the Levites, who would be supported by the tithing system as they
rendered spiritual service to the nation.2
The land was partitioned according to
tribes and families, and the head of each family was to pass his inheritance on
to his sons. But Zelophehad, the great-great-great grandson of Joseph, died in
the wilderness and had no sons (1 Chron. 7:15). Although he did have five
daughters, there was no provision in the law for a man’s daughters inheriting an
estate.
An Exceptional Case
Realizing their father’s legacy was in
jeopardy, Zelophehad’s daughters took action. Despite the firmly established
patriarchal society in which they lived, the five sisters stood before Moses,
Eleazar the priest, the tribal leaders, and the entire community. They made the following appeal: “Why should the name of our father be removed from among his
family because he had no son? Give us a possession among our father’s brothers”
(Num. 27:4 NKJV).
Such an unprecedented request caught Moses off guard. He didn’t know what to do. So he brought their case before the LORD, and this is what the LORD decreed: “The daughters of Zelophehad speak what is right; you shall surely give
them a possession of inheritance among their father’s brothers, and cause the
inheritance of their father to pass to them”
(Num. 27:7). Moreover, additional provisions were made for others who might
otherwise get overlooked in inheritance claims (vv. 9-11).
The Promise Fulfilled
After Moses’ death, as the Israelites
began inhabiting the Promised Land, the daughters of Zelophehad reminded Eleazar
and Joshua that God had commanded Moses to give them an inheritance (Josh. 17:4a). “Therefore, according to the commandment
of the Lord, he gave them an inheritance among their father’s brothers” (v. 4b). Accordingly, the territory of the tribe of
Manasseh was significantly increased (vv. 5-6). Noah and her sisters, to ensure
the property remained in the family, then married sons of their father’s brothers
(Num. 36:10-12).
A Historical Moment
Contrary to modern-day misconceptions,
women in ancient Israel were not second-class citizens to be suppressed and
mistreated with God’s approval. To better appreciate the true state of affairs,
one needs only to understand the plight of women in the ancient world in
general, where male domination was the norm.
Among contemporary Greeks, females had
few rights in comparison to their male counterparts. Since they were considered by nature inferior to men,3 women
were not allowed to inherit or own property. In the early Roman Republic, females were under the authority and
control of their fathers and husbands. Because they were deemed incapable of
acting for themselves, ladies were legally obliged to have a male tutela (“tutor”) to ensure property was
kept in the male-dominated family.4 Among the ancient Egyptians,
where equity between the sexes was afforded some consideration, men still held
the positions of authority and controlled their respective households and land
ownership.5
Even though it was very much a man’s
world, Jewish law elevated women to a unique status. Wives, mothers, and widows
were to be protected, supported, and treated with dignity and respect (Ex.
20:12; Lev. 19:3; Deut. 5:16; 10:18; 18-21; 27:16; Psa. 146:9; Prov. 18:22;
19:14; 31:10-31; et al.). Any injustice, contempt, or maltreatment of women
among the Jews was contrary to and in violation of the divine will.6
Lessons to Learn
Of the approximately two million Jews who
entered the Promised Land (Num. 26:2, 51, 62), how is it that only one family
had no sons? If we concede the providence and foreknowledge of God, this
certainly made the allotment of property much less complicated according to customary
birthright conventions. But what about the daughters of Zelophehad?
· God expects his people to step out in faith and take
action (Jas. 2:17). He doesn’t work through apathy, passivity, or laziness.
Noah and her sisters took initiative in the pursuit of fairness.
· God expects his people to trust him enough to confront
fear (Psa. 27:1). Noah and her sisters, in a male-dominated culture, had the courage to take a stand for what is right.
· God expects his people to put the interests of others
before themselves (1 Cor. 10:24). Noah and her sisters were not selfishly demanding
their perceived rights but seeking to preserve the legacy of their father and provide
a future for their families.
· God will always do what’s right (Deut. 32:4). Noah and
her sisters were a test case, and the Lord turned a potential injustice into a
blessing, not only for these five ladies but for many others who might
otherwise be neglected.
· While God has designated different roles for men and
women, neither is superior to the other; both are equally valued in his sight (Gen.
1:27). Noah and her sisters provide a clear demonstration of this fundamental truth.
Hopefully we can appreciate that the celebrated
ark-builder was not the only hero of faith named “Noah” in the biblical record.
Noah, the daughter of Zelophehad, along with her four sisters, impacted
the world in which they lived and future generations as well. They remain
worthy of our gratitude and recognition.
--Kevin L. Moore
Endnotes:
1 The ancient land of Canaan roughly corresponds to
present-day Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Israel.
2 Num. 18:20-31; Josh. 13:7–19:48.
3 Aristotle, Politics 1.1259b; cf. also Cicero, Pro Murena 12.27; Epictetus, Discourses 2.4.
4 William Smith, William
Wayte, and G. E. Marindin, eds. A
Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (London: John Murray, 1890) <Link>. Under the Empire, it was not legal for women to buy or sell property until the reign of Claudius (AD 41-54), although they still could not vote or hold office (see A. Bell, Jr. Exploring the NT World 195-96).
5 Bob
Brier and Hoyt Hobbs, Ancient Egypt:
Everyday Life in the Land of the Nile (New York: Sterling, 2013): 89 <Link>;
Robert C. Ellickson and Charles DiA. Thorland, “Ancient Land Law: Mesopotamia, Egypt, Israel,” Faculty Scholarship Series 71:321 (1995): 354-56. <Link>
6 The
Talmud prescribed that a Jewish man offer the daily prayer: “Thank you God for
not making me a Gentile, a woman, or a slave” (Menachot 43b-44a). When
divorce became prevalent among the Israelites (Deut. 22:19,
29; Lev. 21:7, 13, 14), it was permitted only because of “hardness of heart” (Matt. 19:8),
serving to protect women from unscrupulous husbands and the precarious charge
of adultery (Deut. 24:1-4; cf. Lev. 20:10; Deut. 22:22).
Image credit:
http://ldsmag.com/were-ancient-israelite-women-named-sariah/
