It has
been estimated that about 70% of Americans do not believe in absolute truth,
and as few as 38% of those who attend what is perceived to be conservative
Christian churches believe in absolute truth.1 Only 9% of American
adults hold a biblical worldview, whereas less than one half of one percent of
those aged 18 to 23 do.2 The majority seems to favor
an open, tolerant, pluralistic society, where individual choice is more
important than absolute standards. Relativism currently reigns as
the non-standard standard: “What I consider right and wrong is true for me, and
what you consider right and wrong is true for you.”
The “politically correct”
agenda, as advocated by media outlets, politicians, the entertainment industry,
and other secular entities, has consistently indoctrinated impressionable minds
with ideas such as: (1) the supremacy of individual choice as the ultimate
criterion; (2) personal feelings and opinions as the primary basis of morality;
(3) truth is subjective and relative to circumstances; (4)
diverse viewpoints are equally valid; (5) unconditional acceptance, inclusiveness,
and tolerance; and (6) the demonization of making negative judgments about
others.3
Relativism in Religion
Postmodernism is a popular
model of thinking that affirms there is no real knowledge or facts or truth in
the objective sense (only subjective interpretations); no uniform or universal
reality.4 And postmodernistic relativism is not
limited to atheists, agnostics, humanists, and skeptics. Universalism
is the belief that all people will ultimately be reconciled to God. Syncretism
is the combining of different religious beliefs, asserting unity and the
inclusion of diverse faiths. Pluralism is accepting all religious paths
as equally valid and promoting coexistence. It is all too common to hear the
adage, “One religion is as good as another.”
For professing
Christians who at least pay lip service to the exclusiveness of the Christian
faith (see John 14:6), alternative slogans include, “One church is as good as
another,” “Join the church of your choice,” and “It doesn’t matter what you
believe, as long as you’re sincere.” Now that Christianized Relativism is so
commonplace in our society, who can be surprised by messages like that of
Victoria Olsteen? She announces to the world: “just do good for your own self.
Do good because God wants you to be happy. When you come to church, when you
worship him, you’re not doing it for God, really, you’re doing it for yourself
...”5
Relativism in Churches of Christ6
With the inroads of
relativism and the denial of absolute truth, we are witnessing among churches
of Christ a rejection or compromise of fundamental tenets such as biblical
authority, the restoration plea, the distinctiveness of the church, worship
guidelines, doctrinal integrity, and a strict moral code. Teachings regarded as
harsh or unpleasant or inconvenient are diluted or changed. Grace and
unconditional acceptance take precedence over repentance, accountability, and
obedience. Rather than appealing to Bible authority and what we know
pleases the Lord, greater emphasis is placed on what interests members (felt
needs) and/or what attracts people in the community. Doctrinal and procedural
change is hailed as essential to salvaging or transforming what is perceived to
be an antiquated and dying church.7 Then there are the catchphrases
that prematurely end dialogue: “Everyone’s entitled to his/her own opinion.”
“That’s just you’re interpretation.” “We’ll just have to agree to disagree.”
“Who are you to judge?!”
The Biblical Perspective
The Bible addresses two types
of human judging; one is condemned, while the other is enjoined. (1) Wrongful
judgment (Matt. 7:1-5; Rom. 2:1-3; 1 Cor. 4:3-5) involves hypocritical
assessments, or trying to discern another’s intentions and motives, or drawing
conclusions without having all the facts, or making judgments based on
misinformation, or using oneself as the standard. (2) Righteous judgment (John
7:24; 1 Cor. 2:15; 5:3, 12; 6:2-5) relies on God’s word as the standard,
evaluates observable actions and substantiated facts, and sincerely has the person’s
best interests at heart.8
If the Bible is to be
taken seriously, the following affirmations must be conceded:
· There
is an objective body of spiritual truth (John 4:24; 8:32; 17:17; Rom. 1:25; 1
Cor. 15:1-4; 2 Cor. 6:7; Gal. 2:5; Eph. 4:21; Col. 1:5; 1 Thess. 2:13; 1
Tim. 3:15; 2 Tim. 2:15; Heb. 4:12; 11:6; Jas. 1:18).
· Truth
is attainable (Mark 12:32; John 4:23-24; 16:13; 17:20-21; Eph. 5:17; 2 Pet.
3:9).
· Truth
is knowable (John 1:14, 17; 8:32; 14:6; Rom. 2:2; Col. 1:6; 1 Tim. 2:4; 2 Tim.
3:7; Heb. 10:26; 1 Jn 2:21; 2 Jn 1).
· Truth
is mutually understandable (Matt. 13:10-16, 23; Mark 7:14; Eph. 3:3-4; 5:17;
Col. 1:9-10; 2 Tim. 2:7).
· One
may err from the truth (John 8:44; Rom. 1:25; Gal. 2:14; 3:1; 5:7; 1 Tim. 6:5;
2 Tim. 2:18; 3:8; 4:1-5; Titus 1:14; Jas. 3:14; 5:19; 2 Pet. 2:2; 1 John 1:8;
2:4; cf. Rom. 1:18).
· Truth
is to be believed (John 8:45-46; Eph. 1:13; 2 Thess. 2:10-13; 1 Tim. 4:3; 2
Tim. 2:25).
· Truth
is to be obeyed (John 3:21; 8:47; 18:37; Rom. 2:8-9; 6:17-18; Gal. 5:7; 1 Pet.
1:22; 1 John 1:6; 2:4-5; 2 John 4; 3 John 3-4).
· Truth
is to be defended (Gal. 4:16; 1 Tim. 3:15; 1 Pet. 3:15; Jude 3; cf. Acts 9:22;
18:28).
· Truth
is to be proclaimed (John 5:33; 8:40, 45-46; 18:37; Acts 26:25; Rom. 9:1; 2
Cor. 5:10-20; 7:14; Eph. 4:15; 1 Tim. 2:7).
Conclusion:
Moral relativism is the
necessary consequence of rejecting God and his word in favor of individual
preference (cf. Rom. 1:18-31). But history has proven many times over that
fallible human beings are an inadequate standard (cf. Prov. 14:12; Jer. 10:23).
Without divine guidelines, there is no such thing as absolute truth, absolute
evil, or absolute good, and everyone does “what is right in his own eyes”
(Judges 17:6; 21:25). One of the best arguments against relativism is the sad
state of our society and world and the turmoil and disunity in religion,
including the Lord’s church. An objective standard of truth that is mutually
accepted, understood, and obeyed is a logical necessity. “Grace and peace be multiplied to
you in the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord, as His divine power has
given to us all things that pertain
to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him who called us by glory and
virtue” (2 Peter 1:2-3 NKJV).
--Kevin L. Moore
Endnotes:
2 “Barna Survey Examines
Changes,” The Barna Group,
<Link>. Alvin Kernan observes that modern education has taken “uncertainty to its nihilistic extremes in the humanities and social sciences, 'demystifying' traditional knowledge, replacing positivism with relativism, substituting interpretation for facts, and discrediting objectivity in the name of subjectivity” (In Plato’s Cave xvi).
3 In reality, it would appear that all are exempt from criticism except those who espouse conservative Christian values.
3 In reality, it would appear that all are exempt from criticism except those who espouse conservative Christian values.
5 “Bill Cosby's response to Victoria Olsteen,” YouTube, <Link>. Conversely, see K. L. Moore's “What Are You Getting Out of Worship?” <Link>.
6 See Phil Sanders, Adrift:
Postmodernism in the Church. Nashville: Gospel Advocate, 2000; and the sequel, A Faith Built on Sand: the
Foolishness of Popular Religion in a Postmodern Age. Nashville: Gospel
Advocate, 2011.
7 See James Norad’s “Why are
Churches of Christ Shrinking?” <Link>; and
K. L. Moore’s response, “Musicals, American Football, and Folks Leaving the Church,” <Link>.
8 “The truth of the gospel is uncomfortable precisely because it is true. The truth of the gospel shows us the strength of self-denial rather than the indulgence of self-affirmation. Clearly stating the truth of the gospel, we have a message with substance and relevance for all of life. It is the way of salvation” (Gregory Alan Tidwell, “The Splendor of Truth,” <Link>).
8 “The truth of the gospel is uncomfortable precisely because it is true. The truth of the gospel shows us the strength of self-denial rather than the indulgence of self-affirmation. Clearly stating the truth of the gospel, we have a message with substance and relevance for all of life. It is the way of salvation” (Gregory Alan Tidwell, “The Splendor of Truth,” <Link>).
Related Posts: The Inconsistency of Relativism
Related articles: Dave Miller's “Political Correctness and 'Bashing',” <Link>; Steve Higginbotham's “Religious Tolerance,“ <Link>; Eric Metaxas, “The new normless: the toll of relativism on our kids,” <Link>. For an interesting comparison to the history of art, watch this video from Prager University.
Related articles: Dave Miller's “Political Correctness and 'Bashing',” <Link>; Steve Higginbotham's “Religious Tolerance,“ <Link>; Eric Metaxas, “The new normless: the toll of relativism on our kids,” <Link>. For an interesting comparison to the history of art, watch this video from Prager University.
As I have come to expect from you,brother,a brilliant article:-)
ReplyDelete