“Indeed, therefore, it is already a
failure for you altogether, that you have lawsuits among one another. Why not
rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be deprived?” (1 Cor. 6:7).1 What
is Paul admonishing his readers to do? To what extent should a Christian allow
him/herself to be wronged?
In the opening verses of chap. 6, Paul is
not addressing criminal or sinful behavior but petty disputes that left the
church susceptible to unnecessary ridicule from outsiders. While the verb aposteréō is rendered “cheat” or “defraud” in many English
translations, in the very next chapter it is used in the sense of “deprive” (7:5).
Paul is addressing the selfish and
arrogant attitudes of those demanding their perceived “rights” at the expense
of fellow believers (cf. 4:6, 18, 19; 5:2; 8:1; etc.). This is in stark contrast
to the noble conduct of the apostles (4:12-13), the opposite of selfless
concern for others (8:13; 10:24), and contrary to Christian love (13:5). God’s
design for the church is not a utopian environment void of conflict but a place
where inevitable disputes are resolved through love (cf. 8:1; 16:14).
The key is what’s in the best interest of
others. Paul affirms that it would be better to suffer personal wrong than to damage the
reputation of the church (1 Cor. 6:7-8; 10:24). This does not suggest, however,
that anyone should simply allow him/herself to be victimized, which would
ultimately benefit neither the victim nor the offender (cf. Phil. 2:4). Nor
does it suggest it is inappropriate to avail oneself of basic human rights (cf.
Acts 25:10-12).
If, for example, a brother in Christ embezzles funds from my bank account, to say and do nothing would be contrary to Christian principles. Sin cannot be tolerated in the church (1 Cor. 5:7; 15:33), it would hamper my God-given responsibility to give to the Lord’s work and provide for my family (1 Cor. 16:2; 1 Tim. 5:8), and the brother’s soul is jeopardized (Gal. 6:1; Jas. 5:19-20). If, however, my brother merely says something in anger that hurts my feelings, then hiring a lawyer and suing for defamation and psychological distress is not a Christ-like response. Between these extremes are plethoric scenarios that may require the collective wisdom of the church to help discern what is necessary for appropriate resolution (cf. 1 Cor. 2:15; 5:3, 12; 1 Tim. 5:20).
If, for example, a brother in Christ embezzles funds from my bank account, to say and do nothing would be contrary to Christian principles. Sin cannot be tolerated in the church (1 Cor. 5:7; 15:33), it would hamper my God-given responsibility to give to the Lord’s work and provide for my family (1 Cor. 16:2; 1 Tim. 5:8), and the brother’s soul is jeopardized (Gal. 6:1; Jas. 5:19-20). If, however, my brother merely says something in anger that hurts my feelings, then hiring a lawyer and suing for defamation and psychological distress is not a Christ-like response. Between these extremes are plethoric scenarios that may require the collective wisdom of the church to help discern what is necessary for appropriate resolution (cf. 1 Cor. 2:15; 5:3, 12; 1 Tim. 5:20).
Followers of Jesus have been “sanctified,”
i.e., set apart from the sinful world in their thinking and behavior.2
Christians are expected to refrain from retaliation (Matt. 5:38-48; Rom.
12:17-21; 1 Thess. 5:15) and be peacemakers (Matt. 5:9; Rom. 12:18). The point
of 1 Cor. 6:1-11, which is an extension of chap. 5, is that discord in the church is to be addressed from within (cf. Matt. 18:15-20; 2
Thess. 3:6-15).
Image
credit: http://churchofchristarticles.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/prayer-man.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment