Abraham, having been justified by faith before his circumcision, was
later circumcised as a ‘sign’ or a ‘seal’ of his justification and is ‘the
father of all those who believe’ (Romans 4:9-12). Since baptism replaced
circumcision under Christ’s new covenant (Colossians 2:11-12), doesn’t it
follow that a person is justified by faith before he is baptized and his
baptism is simply an outward sign of the justification he has already
received?
Remember that Paul’s epistle to the Romans was written to
believers who had already been baptized (6:4). In the context of Romans
chapters 2, 3, and 4, Paul was establishing the fact that the Jews now have no
advantage over the Gentiles -- all are guilty of sin and stand before God on
equal terms (cf. 2:6-11; 3:9, 22-23, 29-30). There was no need for Gentile
Christians to be circumcised (or obey any other requirement of the Law of
Moses), and the Jewish [circumcised] Christians needed to understand that works
of the Law (3:20), including circumcision (2:25-29; 3:1), could not save
them. To illustrate, in chapter 4 Paul showed that Abraham was not saved
by the Law of Moses (v. 13) but by faith. And yet Abraham’s faith was an obedient
faith (cf. Hebrews 11:8-19; James 2:21-24), and all of Abraham’s spiritual
descendants exhibit the same kind of faith (Romans 10:17; 6:16-18; Acts
10:34-35; Hebrews 11:6; 5:9). To be “Abraham’s seed, and heirs according
to the promise” now requires an obedient faith which includes baptism
(Galatians 3:26-29). Any conclusion to the contrary is a misapplication of
Paul’s teachings.
It is true that Abraham was justified prior to his circumcision (Romans 4:10),
but circumcision was not a requirement at the time of Abraham’s initial
justification and he was never under the Law of Moses (Deuteronomy 5:1-3)
wherein circumcision was a fundamental element. However, for the Jews who were
amenable to the Law of Moses, as long as the Law was in effect, circumcision
was essential (Genesis 17:9-14; Leviticus 12:3).
The purpose of Romans 4 was to show Jewish Christians that we are no longer
bound to the Law of Moses (including circumcision), but this has nothing to do
with gospel obedience in general or baptism in particular. And Paul
addresses an entirely separate issue in Colossians 2, so to indiscriminately
mix these two passages together in an attempt to prove a point is to distort
Paul’s arguments. In Romans 4 Paul was addressing physical
circumcision under the Law of Moses. In Colossians 2:11, Paul talks about spiritual
circumcision, “made without hands,” under the law of Christ. While Paul
links baptism with spiritual circumcision (Colossians 2:11-12), nowhere
does the Bible suggest that baptism was a replacement for physical
circumcision. Baptism is for all accountable persons who believe (Matthew
28:19; Acts 16:15, 33), while physical circumcision was only for male Jews
(Genesis 17:2). The only similarities between OT circumcision and NT
baptism are: (1) each was/is deemed essential for those amenable (Genesis
17:14; Mark 16:16); (2) each was/is considered necessary to be in a covenant
relationship with God (Genesis 17:9-14; Galatians 3:27-29); and (3) failure to
obey result[ed/s] in condemnation (Genesis 17:14; 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9; John
3:5).
Paul affirms in Colossians 2:11-13 that “faith in the working of God” is
demonstrated when we are buried and raised with Christ in baptism, by which we
put off “the body [of the sins] of the flesh,” become dead in our trespasses,
and are made alive with Christ through forgiveness of sins. We cannot be
saved in our sins (Romans 6:16, 23). We can only be saved, by God’s
grace, when our sins are forgiven and removed. This takes place when we
exhibit our obedient faith through belief, repentance, and water baptism (Acts
2:37-47). We have this new life, free from sin, after (not before)
we are buried and raised with Christ in baptism (Romans 6:3-5; Acts
22:16). The Bible never describes baptism as an alleged “outward sign of
the justification already received.”
--Kevin
L. Moore
Related Posts: Thief on the Cross, Questions About Baptism (Part 1), Part 2, Part 3
Related Posts: Thief on the Cross, Questions About Baptism (Part 1), Part 2, Part 3
Great post brother I read these every week I'm a Christian in Daytona beach and your scholarship and dedication to the scriptures is encouraging..Also I appreciate your love for missionary work keep laboring..
ReplyDeleteHiram
Thank you Hiram. I've just discovered your comments ... still fairly new at this blogging business. Appreciate your encouragement.
ReplyDelete