In every institution
ordained by God, discipline plays a fundamental role: in the home (Eph. 6:4),
the nation (Rom. 13:1-4), and the church (2 Thess. 3:6). These institutions are
no stronger than their enforcement of God’s laws, and someday parents,
governing officials, and church leaders will be held accountable for how they
have fulfilled their responsibilities toward the souls entrusted to their care
(cf. Heb. 13:17).
Discipline is both
instructive and corrective. In NT Greek the word “discipline” is paideia, meaning “education, training up,
nurture ... instruction, discipline ... correction, chastisement” (H. K.
Moulton, Analytical Greek Lexicon
298). Fathers are to raise their children in the paideia and admonition of the Lord (Eph. 6:4),
scripture is profitable for paideia in
righteousness (2 Tim. 3:16), and the various forms of paideia from the Lord should not be despised
(Heb. 12:5-11).
Admittedly the
disciplining of wayward church members is not a pleasant task, and ignorance of
the biblical process has led to it being abused and neglected. Two major
problems have plagued the Lord’s church concerning the administration of church
discipline: (1) non-use, and (2) misuse. The church at Corinth, for example,
went from practicing no discipline at all (1 Cor. 5:1-2) to being too severe
when action was eventually taken (2 Cor. 2:5-7). Neither extreme is acceptable
and both require a change of direction toward the middle ground of truth (2
Cor. 7:8-12; cf. Rev. 2:14-16).
Church discipline is
first of all positive and preventative. All Christians must be exposed to sound
and consistent teaching (Matt. 28:18-20; Acts 2:41-42; 11:23; 14:21-22; 15:32),
which includes the sometimes unpopular tasks of warning, exhorting, and
correcting (2 Tim. 3:16-17; 4:2). But when a biblically-educated member of the
church is overtaken in a trespass and begins to walk disorderly (Gal. 6:1; 2
Thess. 3:6), further disciplinary measures are to be taken.
Those who are not
walking disorderly should be seeking to restore the erring member with love,
gentleness, patience and humility (Eph. 4:15; Gal. 6:1; 2 Tim. 2:24-25). A
harsh, angry, or unkind approach has the potential of driving the struggling
brother further away from the church (cf. Prov. 15:1, 18; Col. 4:6), and
self-examination will help maintain the right focus (Gal. 5:17, 26; 6:1; 1 Cor.
10:12; 2 Cor. 13:5; 1 Tim. 4:16). But the wayward member must be made aware of
his spiritual condition, clearly warned, and admonished to turn back to a faithful
walk with the Lord (1 Thess. 5:14; Jas. 5:19-20; Tit. 3:10). While individual
admonishing is helpful, it has a greater impact when done by a plurality of
concerned brethren, and more is required than the testimony of just one person
to confirm the sinful behavior and possible impenitent attitude of the
transgressor (cf. Matt. 18:16; 2 Cor. 13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19).
If the wayward member
refuses to heed the admonitions of concerned brethren, the matter is to be
brought before the whole congregation (Matt. 18:17; 1 Tim. 5:20). Since the
Lord gives sinners time to repent (Rev. 2:21; 2 Pet. 3:9), action should not be
taken too quickly. But neither should it be withheld indefinitely, otherwise
its impact will be greatly diminished. Although no specific time-frame is set
forth in scripture, there seems to be a precedent for three admonitions prior
to stronger measures being taken. A divisive man is to be rejected after the first and second admonitions
(Titus 3:10), i.e. the third admonition is when the dismissal takes place. In
Matt. 18:15-17 it was only after the erring brother was (1) individually
contacted, (2) approached with one or two more witnesses, then (3) admonished
by the church that he was to be considered “like the heathen and the tax
collector.” Those needing discipline in Thessalonica were (1) warned by Paul
and his coworkers in person (2 Thess. 3:10), (2) admonished again in the first
epistle (1 Thess. 4:11), and then (3) admonished again in the second epistle (2
Thess. 3:11-12) before the brethren were to withdraw from them (2 Thess. 3:6,
14). When disciplinary action against the immoral brother was called for in 1
Cor. 5, remember that Paul had already (1) personally taught in Corinth (Acts
18:11), (2) wrote a letter dealing with immorality (1 Cor. 5:9), and then (3)
wrote again with further exhortations (1 Cor. 5:1-5) before stronger measures
were taken.
After sufficient
admonitions have been given yet repentance is still not exhibited, the whole
church is to “withdraw from” (2 Thess. 3:6), “not associate with” (1 Cor. 5:11;
2 Thess. 3:14), “turn away from” (Rom. 16:17; Titus 3:10) the errant brother.
The reason for this can be viewed from the following fourfold perspective.
1. God:
Since discipline is a biblical command (2 Thess. 3:6), it serves as a test for
whether or not Christians are “obedient in all things” (2 Cor. 2:9). Even
though it can sometimes be an unpleasant exercise, when faithfully observed the
Lord’s “commandments are not burdensome” (1 John 5:3).
2. The offender:
Church discipline is an expression of loving concern for the erring member (cf.
Heb. 12:5-11), intended to produce recognition of the sin, shame, and godly
sorrow leading to repentance, restoration, and salvation (2 Thess. 3:14; 1 Cor.
5:5; James 5:19-20).
3. The
congregation: Disciplinary action is necessary in order
to keep the church pure. If sin is ignored or allowed to persist unchallenged,
it has the potential of spreading like yeast through a lump of dough (1 Cor.
5:6-8; 15:33; Gal. 5:9), leading to the spiritual disintegration of the whole
body (cf. 2 Pet. 2:13-22; Rev. 2:20). When faithfully administered, however, it
serves as a warning to others that disorderly conduct will not be tolerated (1
Tim. 5:20).
4. The outside
community: The church is to have a positive influence on the world,
bringing glory to God (Matt. 5:13-16; Phil. 2:14-15; 1 Pet. 2:12). But if
sinful behavior is permitted to abide in her midst, not only is this influence
marred or destroyed, ill repute is brought upon the name of the Lord and his
church (Rom. 2:24; 1 Tim. 6:1; 2 Pet. 2:2).
Contrary to what some
might think, this termination of affiliation is not the final step in the
disciplinary process. After the Thessalonica church was instructed to not keep
company with an errant member, they were told: “Yet do not count him as an
enemy, but admonish him as a brother” (2 Thess. 3:15). At least two things can
be gleaned from this statement. First of all, disciplinary action, although
firm and uncompromising, is not intended to be hateful, malicious, or cruel.
Secondly, the withdrawal of association does not mean giving up on this
brother, and further attempts are to be made to bring him back to faithfulness.
The admonishing continues until repentance is forthcoming.
Finally, when church
discipline has fulfilled its intended purpose and the sinner penitently returns
to the Lord, the next steps are forgiveness, acceptance, comfort, and
reaffirmation of love (2 Cor. 2:6-11; Luke 15:11-32). Since the goal has always
been restoration (Gal. 6:1; James 5:19-20), there is no place for resentment,
grudges, or selfish pride (Col. 3:12-14; 1 Cor. 13:4-7). “I say to you that
likewise there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over
ninety-nine just persons who need no repentance” (Luke 15:7).
This article (plus others to follow) is an attempt
to identify and clarify the NT pattern of church discipline. Such an endeavor,
however, is not without its limitations, and caution should be exercised when
seeking to ascertain and implement these procedures. The various biblical texts
which deal with this subject are sometimes addressing different circumstances,
and this fact should be considered before blanket applications are made to
situations which may not be parallel. In a family setting, for instance, the
form and degree of discipline are determined by such variables as age, level of
knowledge, accountability, attitude, pattern of behavior, and the nature of the
offense. May the Lord grant us wisdom as we seek to “warn those who are unruly,
comfort the fainthearted, uphold the weak, [and] be patient with all” (1 Thess.
5:14).
--Kevin L. Moore
Related
Posts: Don't Even Eat With, Biblical Reasons for Withdrawing, Must Discipline be Unanimous?, Inter congregational Responsibilities, When a Family Member is Disciplined
Image
credit: https://www.evangelicalendtimemachine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/saved-from-hell1.png
No comments:
Post a Comment