Contrary to popular
misconceptions, Paul’s approach to missionary work did not merely involve baptizing
people and starting churches. Sufficient resources were invested for adequate
instruction and edification, requiring extended periods of time (cf. Acts 14:3;
18:11; 20:27, 31). When this luxury was not afforded, ample follow-up work was
necessary in order to establish these churches. When only a brief time
was spent in a given location, it was typically because of forced departure rather
than by design.1
The Galatia
Campaign
When Paul and Barnabas reached the city of
Derbe, the end of the first missionary campaign’s evangelistic trail, they did
not continue eastward towards home. “And when they had preached the gospel to
that city and made many disciples, they
returned to Lystra, Iconium, and Antioch, strengthening the souls of the
disciples, exhorting them to
continue in the faith …” (Acts 14:21-22a).2 Not long thereafter Paul
says, “Let us now go back and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached
the word of the Lord, and see how they are doing” (Acts 15:36). This plan was
carried out on multiple occasions (Acts 15:41–16:6; 18:23).
The Macedonia
Campaign
On the second missionary tour at least
three churches were started in the province of Macedonia, beginning at Philippi
(Acts 16:12-40). We don’t know how long Paul and his fellow missionaries were
in that city; the only time indicators are “some days” and “many days” (Acts
16:12, 18). Seeing that they were compelled to leave prematurely, one member of
the mission team appears to have stayed behind to continue the work. The
pronominal “we” (inclusive of Luke) at the beginning of the account (Acts
16:10-16) switches to the third person “they” at departure (Acts 16:40; 17:1),
implying that Luke remained in Philippi – potentially, in view of the next “we”
section (Acts 20:6), for about seven years. There were also follow-up visits
(Phil. 2:19, 24; etc.), noted further below.
Next was Thessalonica, where converts were
made but again the missionaries were forced to leave prematurely (Acts 17:1-10).
Nevertheless, Timothy returned soon and probably again a second time to deliver a letter (1 Thess. 1:1;
2:17; 3:1-6) and perhaps a third time not long thereafter with another letter
(2 Thess. 1:1). The three-man mission team also worked together in nearby
Berea until Paul was forced to leave, while “both Silas and Timothy remained
there” (Acts 17:10-14). After regrouping in Athens, Silas and Timothy went back
to Macedonia (1 Thess. 2:17–3:2; Acts 18:5).
In
total, Timothy made about six documented return trips to Macedonia (1 Thess.
3:1; 2 Thess. 1:1; Acts 19:22; 20:1-4; Phil. 2:19-23), Silas at least one (Acts
18:5), while Paul revisited these brethren no fewer than three times (Acts
19:21; 20:1, 3; Phil. 2:24; 1 Tim. 1:3; cf. 1 Cor. 16:5; 2 Cor. 2:13; 7:5;
9:2-4).
The Achaia
and Asia Campaigns
Paul stayed in Corinth at least a
year and a half, “teaching the word of God among them” (Acts 18:11). He later
returned for a three-month visit (1 Cor. 4:19; 16:5-6; Acts 20:2-3)3 and
possibly again a few years later (2 Tim. 4:20). Follow-up work was also done by Apollos, Timothy, Titus, and others (Acts 19:1; 1 Cor. 4:17; 2 Cor. 7:13-15; 8:16-24; 12:18). While Paul’s first trip to
Ephesus was brief, leaving Aquila and Priscilla there to initiate this work, he
soon went back for an extended three-year mission (Acts 18:18-21; 19:1; 20:31; 1
Cor. 16:8) followed by multiple return visits (Acts 20:17-18; 1 Tim. 1:3; 3:14;
4:13).
Conclusion
The biblical pattern of missionary work
has never been a quick and easy enterprise. While baptizing penitent believers
is essential, converts must be sufficiently taught, grounded in the faith, and
trained in discipleship (Matt. 28:18-20). This requires extensive follow-up
work, with churches not only started but established as faithful,
growing, self-sustaining communities. As we pray for laborers to be sent out
into the Lord’s harvest fields (Luke 10:2), may we never discount the
importance of missionaries returning
to the mission field.
--Kevin L. Moore
Endnotes:
1 Cf. Acts
13:50; 14:5-6, 19-20; 16:30; 17:10.
2 Unless
otherwise noted, scripture quotations are from the NKJV; emphasis added in italics.
3 Some propose another prior visit, inferred from 2 Cor. 12:14; 13:1 and unrecorded in Acts (C. Kruse, Second Corinthians 17-25; L. Morris, First Corinthians 22-25). For interpretive and chronological details of the view stated above, see K. L. Moore, A Critical Introduction to the NT 140-41. Also Chronology of Paul's Work in Corinth.
3 Some propose another prior visit, inferred from 2 Cor. 12:14; 13:1 and unrecorded in Acts (C. Kruse, Second Corinthians 17-25; L. Morris, First Corinthians 22-25). For interpretive and chronological details of the view stated above, see K. L. Moore, A Critical Introduction to the NT 140-41. Also Chronology of Paul's Work in Corinth.
Related
Posts: The First Missionary Journey, The Macedonians Had Names
Image
credit: https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/12530756_f496.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment