Musical Praise and Biblical Silence

     Is it a “sin” to worship with mechanical instruments? This is a loaded question comparable to, “Have you stopped beating your wife?” It can’t be answered with impunity with a simple “yes” or “no.” If one were to say, “Yes, it’s a sin to worship with mechanical instruments,” the inquirer could quickly respond: “Where does the Bible explicitly label it a ‘sin’? If you can’t produce a direct biblical statement, you’re binding what God hasn’t bound!” But to answer with a simple “no” would evoke the response: “If it’s not sinful, it must be okay and you shouldn’t make a big deal out of it.” Either way, the discussion comes to an abrupt halt. This article is an attempt to avert common misunderstandings that result from oversimplification and to address the issue thoughtfully, practically, and biblically.

     The Bible is our complete guide in all spiritual matters, repeatedly admonishing its readers to handle the word of truth accurately and to evade, reject, and denounce its misuse (1 Tim. 2:3-4; 2 Tim. 2:2, 15, 24-26; 3:14-17; 2 Pet. 1:3; 3:14-18; etc.). Here is every text in the New Testament that relates to musical praise in Christian worship: Matthew 26:30; Mark 14:26; Acts 16:25; Romans 15:9; 1 Corinthians 14:15; Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16; Hebrews 2:12; 13:15; James 5:13.¹ Each verse specifies vocal and verbal praise, depicting that which instructs, admonishes, and facilitates understanding.

Scripture	Vocal/Verbal	Instrumental	Both
Matt. 26:30	✔
Mark 14:26	✔
Acts 16:25	✔
Romans 15:9	✔
1 Cor. 14:15	✔
Eph. 5:19	✔
Col. 3:16	✔
Hebrews 2:12	✔
Hebrews 13:15	✔
James 5:13	✔

   Now some might object, claiming that at least some of these verses are taken out of context, to which the following threefold response is offered. First, would it be reasonable to suppose that if any of these passages had mentioned a harp or a trumpet, it would be included in the discussion? Second, even if the dismissal of some of these verses could be rationalized, they cannot all be rejected and the conclusion is still the same. Finally, if all the pertinent information is to be considered, then all the pertinent information ought to be considered.

The Principle of Silence

      To illustrate the biblical principle of silence, consider Acts 15. Certain Jewish Christians were advocating mandatory circumcision (vv. 1, 5). After all, they had plenty of scriptural support for their position in the Old Testament, and neither Jesus nor any of his apostolic representatives had directly discounted this doctrine. How were these teachers and those they taught supposed to know this wasn't right? The Spirit-guided response was simply, “we gave no such commandment” (v. 24  NKJV). In other words, divine silence = no divine sanction. 

     This is further illustrated in Hebrews 7:11-16. How did the Israelites know the divine will concerning the appointment of priests? Quite simply, God explicitly revealed this information: “This is what the LORD commanded to be done …” (Lev. 8:5 ff.), specifying the tribe of Levi as the priestly tribe (cf. Num. 18:1-2; Deut. 33:8-11; Heb. 7:5). God did not (and did not need to) provide a list of other Israelite tribes in order to directly forbid the appointment of priests from any of them. By specifying Levi, all other tribes were implicitly excluded.

     In view of God’s silence concerning the other tribes, would it have been according to his revealed will to appoint priests from the tribe of Reuben, Simeon, Judah, Zebulun, or Issachar? What about Dan, Gad, Naphtali, or Benjamin? The Lord never said not to. What if some from the other tribes were capable of performing priestly duties just as well as or even better than the Levites? And who better than the Lord Jesus to function as priest? Would it have been according to God’s revealed will for Jesus to have served as a Jewish priest while he was living on earth, even though he was not a descendent of Levi?

     “For He [Jesus] of whom these things are spoken belongs to another tribe, from which no man has officiated at the altar. For it is evident that our Lord arose from Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priesthood” (Heb. 7:13-14, emp. added). Why would Jesus not have been permitted to serve as an Israelite priest on earth? It had nothing to do with whether or not he was capable of doing the job, or whether he or others may have desired it. It had nothing to do with God having directly forbidden it (because he didn’t). It had everything to do with the silence of scripture. Moses “spoke nothing” concerning it; i.e., there was no divine sanction for a person from the tribe of Judah (even Jesus!) to serve as priest.

Generic and Specific Instructions²

     What if the injunction was, “Appoint priests from among the Israelites”? Accordingly, anyone from any of the tribes would be allowed; but the requirement was not this generic. The law directed the appointment of priests from among the Israelite tribe of Levi. Therefore, anyone from Reuben, Simeon, Judah, Zebulun, etc., would necessarily be excluded.

     What if the Bible said, “Commemorate the Lord’s death with food and drink”? Accordingly, any type of food and drink (brownies, carrots, water, coffee) would be permissible; but the stipulated elements of the Lord’s Supper are not this generic. The Lord’s death is to be commemorated with unleavened bread and fruit of the vine (cf. Matt. 26:17, 26-29). Therefore, any other elements are automatically eliminated.

     What if the New Testament said, “Offer music to God as Christian worship”? Accordingly, any type of music (singing, electric guitar, saxophone, etc.) would be permissible; but the musical praise specified in the New Testament is not this generic. The New Testament affirms, “… singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord” (Eph. 5:19 + nine other verses). Therefore, any other type of music would necessarily be excluded.

Is Silence Permissive or Prohibitive?

     The injunction to appoint priests from among the Israelite tribe of Levi would permit anyone within the stated category, including tall Levites, short Levites, brown-haired Levites, black-haired Levites, dark-complected Levites, light-complected Levites, etc. None of these options deviates from the specified command. But the injunction to appoint priests from among the Israelite tribe of Levi would prohibit Egyptians, Assyrians, Reubenites, Simeonites, etc. (even serving alongside the Levites), because these options exceed the parameters of the specified command.

     The directive to commemorate the Lord’s death with unleavened bread and fruit of the vine would permit plates or trays or baskets or containers for the specified elements, none of which adds to or deviates from the stated instructions. But the directive to commemorate the Lord’s death with unleavened bread and fruit of the vine does prohibit brownies, carrots, water, coffee, etc. (even if consumed along with the specified elements), because they are unauthorized additions to what scripture teaches.

     The New Testament directive to sing and make melody in your heart to the Lord would permit song books or overheads (for words), a tuning fork (for pitch), a song leader (for tempo), none of which deviates from the specified instructions. But there is no New Testament authorization for playing and making melody on a piano in worship (even to accompany the singing), or beating drums, or juggling Bibles, or dancing with hula hoops, etc. All humanly-devised additions to the specified instructions are implicitly prohibited if the Lord has given no such directive.

Respecting God’s Authority

     Whatever is not communicated in the sacred writings (specifically or generically) is necessarily excluded from God’s revealed will. If the principle of biblical authority is rejected, anything that is not explicitly forbidden in scripture must therefore be permissible, including a universal pope, praying to Mary, praying to angels, praying to departed saints, prayers for the dead, baptizing infants, sprinkling as a mode of baptism, baptizing with rose petals instead of water, sale of indulgences, polygamy, smoking marijuana to heighten the worship experience, et al.

     Even though the New Testament is silent on all of the above and does not explicitly forbid any of them, each must be rejected simply because none is biblically sanctioned. Mechanical instruments of music in Christian worship are to be opposed, not because they are expressly forbidden by the scriptural directive to sing but because there is no New Testament authorization for their use.

     What is our purpose for worshiping? If our primary aim is to please the Lord,³ the only way to be certain about what pleases him is according to what he has chosen to reveal to us. We know what the will of God is by what is revealed in the Bible (Eph. 3:3-5; 5:17), not by what is left unsaid. The heavenly Father presently communicates through his Son Jesus Christ, and the new covenant of God’s Son has superseded the old covenant of Moses and the Jews (Heb. 1:1-2; 8:6-13). If the Lord has not ordered drum beating or trumpet blowing or guitar strumming to replace or accompany singing from the heart as Christian worship, who is presumptuous enough to offer it to him anyway, and by whose authority?

--Kevin L. Moore

Endnotes:

     ¹ All scripture references in the New Testament to man-made musical instruments (Matt. 11:17; Luke 7:32; 15:25; 1 Cor. 13:1; 14:7-8; Rev. 5:8; 14:2; 15:2) involve figurative imagery illustrating things other than Christian worship. For a Presbyterian perspective with insightful historical observations, see G. I. Williamson’s “Instrumental Music in Worship: Commanded or Not Commanded?” in The Westminster Presbyterian (2001), <Link>. Scripture quotations are from the NKJV.

     ² Examples are numerous. The Lord’s expectation for Christians assembling together (1 Cor. 14:26; Heb. 10:25) does not stipulate a specific gathering place, therefore rental halls and church buildings are sanctioned under this generic prescription. The necessity of hearing and understanding the communication of God’s message (Mark 7:14; Jas. 1:21) justifies sound systems and microphones. The universal proclamation of the gospel (Matt. 28:19; Mark 16:15) authorizes a variety of transportation modes.

     ³ Please read Matt. 5:16; John 8:29; 2 Cor. 5:9; Gal. 1:10; Col. 1:9-10; 1 Thess. 2:4; 4:1; 2 Tim. 2:15; Heb. 13:16; 1 John 3:22.

Related Posts: What Are You Getting Out of Worship?; Proof that Instrumental Music is Acceptable?; Acceptability of What Appears to Be Unauthorized

Related articles: Wes McAdams’ Why Must You Use Instruments to Worship?, Argument from Silence, Is it Wrong?; Allen Webster’s Why Do Churches of Christ Not Use Instruments?; Wayne Jackson's Silence of the Scriptures; Patrick Swayne's Silence in the Scriptures 

Image credit: https://hoardercomesclean.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/art31580.jpg?w=440

Musicals, American Football, and Folks Leaving the Church

     My wife loves musicals. Me …. not so much. Over the years we have attended a few together, and I have even made feeble attempts to enjoy them. But I must confess, they just aren’t my cup of tea. It has nothing to do with the performers, the music, the sets, or the quality of the shows. It has everything to do with my less-than-sophisticated preferences and my less-than-enthusiastic attitude. I would much rather be at a football game.

     A few years ago my bride begged me to accompany her to Tim Rice and Andrew Lloyd Webber’s Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat in the hopes that I would appreciate it as much as she did. Being the supportive husband that I am, I begrudgingly complied, and throughout the entire program I couldn’t help thinking, “They’ve ruined a perfectly good Bible story!”

     If I could have spoken to the director, I had a long list of suggested improvements. Instead of an orchestra, a marching band would have been so much better. Rather than the extravagant costumes, I would have preferred shoulder pads and helmets. It would have been more appealing to me if the choreography and singing were replaced with blocking and tackling. In fact, I am almost certain that with my proposed changes more football fans would be attracted to the performances. Conversely, dismissing these ideas would pretty much guarantee that more and more prospective audience members would continue to visit other theaters and stadiums until they found what they were looking for.

     Directors have a choice: (a) stubbornly cling to the composers’ original version, thereby deterring those who prefer something different; or (b) implement the sensible advice of football fans, thus increasing ticket sales and filling the seats. Granted, the original script would have to be amended, but wouldn’t Tim Rice and Andrew Lloyd Webber want the theaters full?

An Individualistic Focus

     If my main concern is me, I expect others to cater to what I like and what I want. What can I get out of it? What kind of experience can I have? It is more blessed to receive than to give. Sure, I’ll turn my attention to God if it doesn’t inconvenience me and as long as I am free to express myself in ways that make me feel good. And I might even be involved in service projects if it increases my sense of belonging and self-worth. So what’s in it for me?

     If churches can identify what appeals to Baby Boomers, Generation X, Millennials, etc., and then design worship experiences to suit each one, the pews would be packed! After all, we can’t show people the way of salvation unless they come to church, right? But what happens when the simple message of the gospel doesn’t appeal to them either? I guess more changes will have to be made.

A Relational Focus

     Alternatively, what if my focus is God? How would that affect the way I view the Bible, the church, the Christian life, and the rest of the world? Our creator has composed a script, which directs his people how to conduct themselves on the stage of life (2 Tim. 3:16-17; cf. 1 Cor. 4:9). He provides clear instructions for salvation, service, relationships, morality, outreach, and worship. Church leaders have a choice: (a) closely follow the divine plan with the fundamental aim of pleasing the Lord, or (b) yield to disgruntled members who are looking for something more.

What the Experts are Saying

     There is no shortage of expressed opinions about why folks are leaving the church and the best ways to fix the problem. But why not listen to the real experts?

     Jesus the Christ: “… for I always do the things that are pleasing to him” (John 8:29); “let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 5:16).¹

     Paul the apostle: “For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ” (Gal. 1:10); “Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth” (2 Tim. 2:15).

     Paul and Timothy: “So whether we are at home or away, we make it our aim to please him” (2 Cor. 5:9) “… we have not ceased to pray for you, asking that you may be filled with the knowledge of his will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding, so as to walk in a manner worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing to him, bearing fruit in every good work and increasing in the knowledge of God” (Col. 1:9-10).

     Paul, Silvanus and Timothy: “but just as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel, so we speak, not to please man, but to please God who tests our hearts …. Finally, then, brothers, we ask and urge you in the Lord Jesus, that as you received from us how you ought to walk and to please God, just as you are doing, that you do so more and more” (1 Thess. 2:4; 4:1).

     The inspired writer of Hebrews: “Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God” (Heb. 13:16).

     John the apostle: “… we keep his commandments and do what pleases him” (1 John 3:22).

What’s Love Got to Do with It?

     No other commandment is greater than these: “‘you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength’, [and] ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself’” (Mark 12:30-31). When these foundational rules are implemented, no part of God’s will is compromised, neglected, or ignored. Love is not a heightened emotional experience generated by external gadgets and gimmicks. Love is a command to be obeyed.² Love is a conscious decision to genuinely pursue the interests of others beyond oneself.³

     We do a grave disservice when our aim is to cater to and facilitate the self-gratification of any person or generational subgroup. Surely it is right to mentor and teach our kids and young adults and older adults and neighbors to truly love God, to learn his will, to obey him, and to earnestly strive to please him. No amount of lighting effects, video screens, disco balls, rock bands, or other artificial novelties can ever replace (or constructively supplement) what has already been supplied from the heavenly throne. The changes we need to be concerned about are more effective ways of planting the word of God into receptive hearts, engendering love for God and his human creation, then experiencing the transformative power of God at work.⁴

     It doesn’t matter if the Lord’s church assembles in comfortable auditoriums, schoolrooms, living rooms, cardboard shacks, or dark and gloomy catacombs. By striving to please God above all else, our lives are impacted infinitely more than anything we might try to produce otherwise. It’s not about me. It’s not about you. It’s not about the shallow quirks of any particular age group. It’s about biblical love, directed far beyond self, and demonstrated in word and in action with all the heart, soul, mind and strength.

--Kevin L. Moore

Endnotes:

     ¹ All scripture quotations are from the English Standard Version; emphasis added. See also Romans 12:1-2; 1 Corinthians 7:32; Philippians 4:18; Colossians 3:20; Hebrews 11:5-6; 13:20-21.

     ² John 13:34; 14:15; 15:10, 12, 17; Romans 12:9; 13:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:5; 1 John 2:7-11; 3:18, 23; 4:7-12; 2 John 5-6.

     ³ 1 Corinthians 13:5; cf. 10:24; John 3:16; 15:13; Romans 5:8; 2 Corinthians 5:15; Philippians 2:4; James 3:14-16; 1 John 3:16.

     ⁴ “And we also thank God constantly for this, that when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men but as what it really is, the word of God, which is at work in you believers” (1 Thessalonians 2:13).

Related Posts: Restoring True Worship, Getting to Know Jesus, What Are You Getting Out of Worship?

Related Articles: Wes McAdams' Experience Driven Church, An Open Letter, and Stop Turning Worship into a Talent Show; Andy Brewer's The Real Reason Churches are Shrinking; Krista Cannon's A Response; Stan Mitchell's Church Growth; Sean McDowell's Why Do Kid's Leave the Church?; Avery Foley's Liberal Theology Doesn't Save; David Tant's Full service church?; Jonathan Aigner's What's Next for Contemporary Worship?

Image credit: http://blogs.atrapalo.com/prensa/files/2012/08/publico_concierto_original.jpg