Wednesday, 14 October 2026

The Sermon on the Mount: An Overview (Part 4 of 4)

Do Not Worry (Matthew 6:25-34)

There are greater human needs than the supply of food, drink, clothing, or any other physical provisions (Matt. 6:25). The heavenly Father takes care of the birds, which are of lesser value than his human creation (v. 26). Worrying will not make any positive difference (v. 27). If God “clothes” the temporal earth with flowers and grass, he will certainly provide for our necessities (vv. 28-32).1


Senseless worry demonstrates the comparative smallness of one’s faith (Matt. 6:30). “Gentiles” (outside the circle of God’s covenant people) seek the essentials of physical life, but God is already aware of what we need (v. 32). What is truly important is God’s kingdom and his righteousness (v. 33), which we are to not only “seek” (cf. Prov. 2:2-5; Acts 15:17; 17:27) but to “seek first” (cf. Matt. 16:24; 1 Tim. 4:8), with the assurance that he will take care of whatever we need (cf. Psa. 34:10). Seeing that each day brings enough of its own trouble, why add to it by worrying?! (Matt. 6:34; cf. Phil. 4:6-7).


How Disciples of Jesus are to Live in the World (Matthew 7:1-27)


Attitudes toward each other (Matt. 7:1-6). The verb “judge” (krinō), descriptive of one who “condemns,” refers here to hypocritical judging or unfair criticism. The Bible addresses two types of human judging. One is denounced, while the other is enjoined. Wrongful judgment (Matt. 7:1-5; Rom. 2:1-3; 14:4; 1 Cor. 4:3-5; Col. 2:16) involves hypocritical assessments, or trying to discern another’s intentions and motives, or drawing conclusions without having all the facts, or making judgments based on misinformation, or using oneself as the standard (cf. Jas. 2:13; 4:11-12). Righteous judgment (John 7:24; 1 Cor. 2:15; 5:3, 12; 6:2-5) relies on God’s word as the standard, evaluates observable actions and substantiated facts, and sincerely has the person’s best interests at heart (cf. Gal. 1:9; 1 John 4:1; 2 John 10-11).


While making judgments (decisions) and condemning error is necessary and expected (Matt. 7:6, 15-20; 18:15-17), one’s attitude and behavior must be in line with the divine will (cf. Matt. 6:14-15; 18:23-35; Rom. 2:21-23; Jas. 4:11-12). On the proverbial saying about receiving according to the measure given, see also Mark 4:24; Luke 6:38. Observing the “speck” in a brother’s eye is a legitimate recognition of a fault but is hypocritical if ignoring the “plank” (log, beam, rafter) in one’s own eye and failing to apply the same standard of criticism (Matt. 7:3-5; cf. 18:23-35).


There are limits on the Lord’s prohibition against judging. Sacred and valuable things (of God) are to be given only to those who accept and appreciate them and withheld from those who are unreceptive and dismissive (Matt. 7:6; cf. 5:8; 13:45-46; 16:23; Mark 6:11; John 8:43-47; Acts 18:6; Rom. 8:5-8; 1 Cor. 1:18-25; 2:13-16; 2 Cor. 4:3-4). In the context of Judaism, dogs and pigs were considered “unclean” (Ex. 22:31; 2 Pet. 2:22; cf. Matt. 15:26; Phil. 3:2). That which is sacred must never be treated as common or trivial (cf. 1 Cor. 11:27-30; Heb. 10:29; 1 Pet. 1:17-19). Note Jesus’s example (Matt. 15:2-3; 21:23-27) and that of his disciples (Matt. 10:13-14; Acts 13:46; 19:9).


Attitudes toward God (Matt. 7:7-11). The imperative verbs “ask … seek … knock” are connected to prayer and are all in the present tense, i.e., ongoing, continual, persistent (cf. Luke 11:5-8; 18:1-8). However, asking without seeking (making the effort to utilize what God has already provided) is insufficient, and seeking without accessing providential doors of opportunity also falls short. If earthly fathers, though “evil” (cf. Psa. 14:1-3), provide for their children (note “bread” and “fish” common around the Sea of Galilee, cf. Matt. 14:17), “how much more” will the heavenly Father provide for his children (Matt. 7:9-11; cf. 6:25-34; Luke 11:13; Jas. 1:17).


The Golden Rule (Matt. 7:12). “Therefore” marks the climax of the preceding (perhaps all the way back to 5:3?). This brief statement encapsulates the attitude and behavior expected of the Lord’s followers: “whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them …”2 Reminding Jewish listeners of what they should already know and practice, “for this is the Law and the Prophets” (cf. 5:17; 11:13), the directive is a concise summary of the revealed will of God with respect to human relations. Compare Matt. 22:36-40, “… ‘love the LORD your God … love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets” (cf. Gal. 5:14). Christ’s “golden rule” is what it means to “love your neighbor as yourself” (Matt. 22:39).


Counterfeit Vs. True Discipleship (Matt. 7:13-27). Note the contrasts between two ways (Matt. 7:13-14), two trees (vv. 15-20), two confessions (vv. 21-23), and two foundations (vv. 24-27).


A decision has to be made about which of life’s roads to travel: the broad (easy) way or the narrow (difficult) way (Matt. 7:13-14; cf. Luke 13:24; Deut. 11:26; 30:19; Jer. 21:8). Unfortunately, only a comparative few (cf. Matt. 22:14) seem willing to choose Jesus as the way (John 14:6; cf. Acts 4:12), the door (John 10:7, 9), the source of truth (John 1:14, 17; 14:6; 1 John 5:20), the giver of life (John 1:5; 5:26; 6:51; 10:10; 11:25-26; 14:6), and access through his church (Acts 9:2; 19:9, 23; 24:14, 22). Any other way may seem easier and more appealing but ultimately leads to spiritual destruction (Psa. 1:1, 6; Prov. 14:12; 16:25; 2 Thess. 1:6-9; Heb. 2:1-3; 10:29-31).


Heading in a different direction are false prophets and false disciples (Matt. 7:15-23; cf. Luke 6:25-27, 43-45). Prophets are supposed to be God’s spokesmen (Matt. 10:41; 23:34; Acts 13:1), not all of whom are legitimate (Matt. 24:11, 24; Deut. 13:1-5; 18:20-22; 1 Kgs. 18:20-46; 22:1-28; Acts 13:6; 2 Pet. 2:1). They cannot be recognized merely by outward appearances (cf. 2 Cor. 11:15) but by their “fruits” or observable actions (cf. Matt. 3:10; John 15:6; Gal. 5:22; Jas. 3:11-12). The ultimate test of discipleship is obedience (Matt. 7:21; see also 12:50; 21:31; Luke 6:46; John 8:51; 14:15, 21-24; 15:10-14; Rom. 1:5; 6:16-18; 15:18; 16:19, 26; 2 Cor. 10:5, 6; Gal. 5:6; 2 Thess. 1:8-9; Heb. 5:8-9; et al.).3


Continuing the emphasis on “doing” the Father’s will (Matt. 7:21-23), building-construction imagery was no doubt a familiar analogy to Jesus, considering his experience as a carpenter (Mark 6:3; cf. Matt. 13:55). The wise and the foolish (cf. Matt. 25:2) are distinguished by how they respond to the Lord’s directives (cf. Matt. 13:19-23; Luke 16:29; Rom. 2:3; Jas. 1:22).4


Conclusion (Matthew 7:28-29)


The teaching presented by Jesus in this sermon was not only for his disciples (Matt. 5:1) but also for “the people” (7:28). They were “astonished” at what Jesus was saying (cf. Matt. 13:54; 22:22, 33) because of his apparent “authority” (Matt. 7:28-29; cf. 8:9; 9:6-8; 10:1; 21:23; 28:18; John 5:27; 10:18; 17:2), in contrast to the Jewish scribes (learned scholars) who tended to rely more on the authority of others. To borrow R. T. France’s observation: “The teaching of the Sermon on the Mount is not meant to be admired but to be obeyed” (The Gospel According to Matthew TNTC 146).


--Kevin L. Moore


Endnotes:

     1 Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are from the New King James Version (1996).

     2 The negative form of this principle appears in various ancient documents along the following lines: “Do not do to others what you would not want done to you” (cf. Isocrates, Plato, Aristotle, Confucius, and multiple Jewish teachers). But Jesus is the first on record to express the positive form, albeit referencing “the Law and the Prophets.”

     3 Jesus calls God “My Father” in Matt. 7:21; 10:32-33; 11:27; 12:50; 15:13; 16:17; 18:10, 19, 55; 20:23; 24:36; 25:34; 26:29, 39, 42, 53 (note also John’s Gospel!). On “doing” the will of the Father, see Matt. 7:15-20, 21-23, 24-27; 12:50; 21:31; cf. Col. 6:6; Heb. 10:7, 9, 36.

     4 See also Job 21:17-18; Psa. 37:10; 91:1-16; 125:1; Prov. 10:25; 12:3; 2 Tim. 1:12.


Related Posts: Labeling False Teachers, Sermon on the Mount: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3

 

Image credit: https://www.peakpx.com/en/search?q=two+ways

Wednesday, 7 October 2026

The Sermon on the Mount: An Overview (Part 3 of 4)

Meaningless Oaths (Matthew 5:33-37)

In contrast to Jewish teachers who warned against swearing (taking a vow or oath) falsely (v. 33), Jesus goes even further and condemns trivializing dishonesty and presumptuously and arrogantly establishing one’s word on things beyond one’s control (cf. Matt. 23:16-21; Jas. 4:13-16).1 The Lord’s exhortation is to say what you mean and mean what you say (v. 37), i.e., honesty, integrity, character, trustworthiness.


Retaliation Prohibited (Matthew 5:38-42)


Although selfish retribution may have been legitimized among the Jewish people at the time (Matt. 5:38), the Law required the victim to bring the offender to trial, and the authorities were to inflict the appropriate punishment, not exceeding the original offense (Ex. 21:23-25; Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 19:15-21). While evil itself is to be resisted (cf. Jas. 4:7), the Lord’s prohibition is against resisting an evil person or evil treatment (Matt. 5:39a). The behavior of a follower of Jesus is not to be determined by someone else’s sinful words and actions (cf. Luke 6:29-30).


What about a slap on the cheek (Matt. 5:39b)? Retaliation only exacerbates the situation (cf. Matt. 7:12; John 18:22, 23; Rom. 12:17; Prov. 24:29), especially in the context of brutal Roman aggression and abusive religious leaders. What about losing one’s tunic in a lawsuit (Matt. 5:40)? Rather than revenging unjust treatment, evil is to be overcome with good (cf. Rom. 12:19-21; 1 Cor. 6:7).


What about being conscripted to travel a lengthy distance (Matt. 5:41)? Any Roman soldier or authority figure had the legal right to compel anyone from the subjugated populace to assist him on a journey up to a mílion. A Roman mile, literally “a thousand paces,” became “a fixed measure … 1,478.5 meters” (BDAG 651), compared to an English mile of 1,609.344 meters. A disciple of Jesus, in this oppressive environment, had the opportunity to make a lasting impression by going beyond what was required.


What about a request for assistance (Matt. 5:42a)? A follower of Christ is to have a benevolent disposition, seeing that even the Law required helping the needy (Lev. 25:35-36; Deut. 23:19-20). What about a request for a loan (Matt. 5:42b)? Being benevolent toward a borrower was also enjoined in the Law (Ex. 22:25).


Jesus addresses real-life situations that his immediate audience would have faced in a society controlled by corrupt Jewish authorities and tyrannical Roman oppressors (see also 1 Thess. 5:15; 1 Pet. 3:9).


Love Your Enemies (Matthew 5:43-48)


There is no explicit command in the Mosaic Law to hate one’s enemies, but this attitude naturally developed (cf. Psa. 139:21-22). Disciples of the Lord are to rise above the typical ways other human beings react toward one another. The world should be viewed through God’s eyes: with love, blessings, good deeds, and prayer (cf. Luke 6:27-28).


The Heavenly Perspective (Matthew 6:1-34)


The way of Christ means doing good to please God rather than to be seen of men (Matt. 6:1-4). One’s “charitable deeds” (NKJV) or “practicing … righteousness” (ESV) is not for show or to draw undue attention to oneself. This concerns the motive, whereas Matt. 5:16 addresses the desired result (cf. Mark 12:41-44; Acts 4:36-37). Those who seek to impress fellow humans only have temporal reward, whereas seeking to please and honor God carries everlasting rewards (Matt. 25:34-40).


A Model for Praying and Fasting (Matthew 6:5-18)


Private prayer (“when you [singular] pray …”)2 is not for public show but an intimate communication with the heavenly Father (Matt. 6:5-8). What has traditionally been labeled “the Lord’s Prayer,” or more appropriately “a model prayer,” was taught by Jesus as a sample of how to pray (Matt. 6:9-15; cf. Luke 11:2-4). This model prayer (a) is addressed to the heavenly Father, (b) acknowledges his holiness, (c) desires his sovereignty, (d) seeks his will, (e) asks for his provision, (f) requests his forgiveness, (g) depends on his spiritual guidance and protection. Whether private (individual) or public (collective), we ought to be mindful and inclusive of one another in prayer: “Our Father ... give us this day ... forgive us ... do not lead us ... deliver us ...”


As we acknowledge our own human frailties and weaknesses, we have God’s permission to ask in prayer, “lead us not into temptation” (Matt. 6:13a).3 However, if we are unwilling to avail ourselves of all that he provides to help us along the way, we are missing a key component of the petition, “Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven” (v. 10b). Satan tempts. God provides. We decide which path to follow. Being forgiving is a prerequisite for being forgiven (Matt. 6:12, 14, 15; cf. Matt. 18:23-35; Mark 11:25-26). And we can be assured that God always answers according to his perfect will (1 John 5:14-15).


Fasting is also meant to please God rather than to be seen of men (Matt. 6:16-18). Often coupled with prayer (Ezra 8:21-23; Dan. 9:3; Matt. 17:21; Luke 2:37; Acts 13:3; 14:23), individual fasting is personal and should not be done for show or with improper motives (Isa. 58:3-10; cf. Dan. 9:3-5). While the Law of Moses enjoined one day of fasting each year for the people of Israel (Lev. 23:26-32; Acts 27:9), individuals fasted on various other occasions for different periods for a variety of purposes (cf. Matt. 9:14; Acts 10:30).


Reasons for fasting included bereavement (1 Sam. 1:12; 3:35; 2 Sam. 31:13; 1 Chron. 10:12; Dan. 10:2-3), public calamities (2 Sam. 1:12), afflictions (2 Sam. 12:16; Psa. 35:13; Dan. 6:18), eminent danger (Esther 4:16), remorse for sins (1 Sam. 7:6; Neh. 9:1-2), humility (Neh. 9:1; Psa. 35:13), and seeking divine guidance or favor (Ezra 8:21; Acts 13:3; 14:23). There is a time and place for everything (Eccl. 3:1), and fasting is neither a mindless and meaningless ritual nor an activity for public spectacle.


Treasures in Heaven, the Lamp of the Body, and Riches (Matthew 6:19-24)


Rather than accumulating temporary earthly possessions for selfish purposes, the focus of the heart ought to be directed toward the accumulation of permanent heavenly treasures (Matt. 6:19-21; cf. Col. 2:2). The “eye” represents one’s singular focus, whether earthly or heavenly. The former leaves one consumed with spiritual darkness, whereas the latter provides enlightenment (Matt. 6:22-23). The choice is between two masters: (a) an earthly focus leading to being enslaved to mamōnâs (Aramaic “riches”) or worldly things; or (b) a heavenly focus leading to service to God (Matt. 6:24; cf. 19:21-22).


--Kevin L. Moore


Endnotes:

     1 On the Jewish practice of oath-taking, see Num. 6:1-5; 30:2; Matt. 26:63; Acts 18:18; 2 Cor. 1:23 (cf. Judg. 11:30 ff.).

     2 Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are from the New King James Version (1996).

     3 See K. L. Moore, “What Are We Asking? (Part 1),” Moore Perspective (28 Sept. 2022),<Link>, + accompanying Links (Parts 2–3).


Related Posts: God Answers Prayer, Sermon on the Mount: Part 1, Part 2

 

Image credit: https://unsplash.com/photos/silhouette-of-a-man-looking-up-in-the-rain-fMALtb07r9Y

Wednesday, 30 September 2026

The Sermon on the Mount: An Overview (Part 2 of 4)

The Place of the Lord’s Disciples in the World (Matthew 5:13-16)

Seeing that salt is a preservative (Matt. 5:13a), the very presence of the Lord’s people on earth (the blessed ones of vv. 3-12) helps prevent total moral corruption that would otherwise necessitate the world’s destruction. But if followers of Jesus fail to endure in the face of worldly temptations, distractions, and persecutions (vv. 10-11), they lose their Christlike influence and therefore serve no useful or impactful purpose (v. 13b; cf. Mark 9:49-50).


As Jesus is “the light of the world” (John 8:12; 9:5),1 it is said of his faithful disciples, “You are the light of the world” (Matt. 5:14a), illuminating the realm of spiritual darkness and dispelling ignorance and sin by living and proclaiming God’s word (cf. Matt. 10:27; Mark 4:21-25; Luke 8:16-18; 11:33-36). Note the broad-to-narrow focus: world … city … house (Matt. 5:14-16). The behavior and works of Christ’s loyal followers are observable, with the express purpose of glorifying the heavenly Father (Matt. 5:16).


The expression “Father in heaven” (Matt. 5:16, 45, 48; 6:1, 9, 26; 7:11, 21) is not found in the Old Testament. The expression “our/your Father” does not occur in Luke, only once in Mark (11:25), but multiple times in Matthew (5:16, 45; 6:1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 14, 18, 32; 7:11).


The Law of Moses and the Law of Christ (Matthew 5:17-48)


Speaking to a pre-Christian Jewish crowd—at least two years before Christ’s new covenant was ratified (cf. Heb. 9:15-17)—rather than taking issue with or negating the Mosaic Law at this point in his ministry, Jesus opposes wrongful interpretations of it. “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled” (Matt. 5:17-18).


These listeners were assured that Christ’s purpose was not to nullify (destroy, overthrow, abrogate) the Law or the Prophets. In fact, Jesus himself was an Israelite who was amenable to the Jewish Law (Gal. 4:4; cf. Matt. 8:4), and he kept it perfectly. Instead, his purpose was to “fulfill” (plēróō = to fill up or make full) all that the Law and the Prophets had said concerning the promised Messiah.


One of the primary aims of Matthew’s Gospel is to establish the fact that Jesus and all that was accomplished in his ministry were in fulfillment of the prophetic scriptures (Matt. 1:22; 2:15, 17, 23; 4:14; 8:17; 12:17; 13:35; 21:4; 26:54, 56; 27:9, 35). Accordingly, these things were not to remain unfulfilled for millennia after the Lord’s death, resurrection, and ascension. Once Jesus accomplished his mission on earth, the role that the Law and the Prophets had served for centuries was complete (see Gal. 3:16-25; Heb. 8:6-13). In other words, when the intended purpose was fulfilled, that purpose then became obsolete.


Contrary to what many have inferred from this text, the Lord did not say that the old Mosaic legal system was to remain binding until the end of time. Twice in this passage he uses the expression héōs án (“until”). From the standpoint of his contemporary Jewish audience, heaven and earth could pass away at any time. Yet the Lord affirms that until that happens (whenever that might be), nothing will fail from the Law or the Prophets until all things come to pass. This is a statement of assurance, i.e., the Law will unquestionably be vindicated and will have served its purpose when Jesus has completed his personal mission on earth (cf. John 4:34; 5:36; 17:4; 19:30).


The six antitheses of Matt. 5:21-48, rather than taking issue with the written Law of Moses, contrast the traditional misinterpretations of the Law vs. the loftier conduct expected in the Lord’s kingdom (cf. v. 20). Note, “You have heard that it was said …” (Matt. 5:21, 27, 31, 33, 38, 43), NOT “You have read” or “It is written …” The Law never states, “hate your enemy” (Matt. 5:43b; cf. Lev. 19:17-18), but apparently this is what these Jews had heard from their misguided teachers. The Law did not justify unrighteous anger as long as it didn’t lead to murder, or lust as long as it didn’t lead to adultery, or divorce for any or no reason, or questionable oaths, or senseless retribution, or hatred …. irrespective of what others had “said” to the contrary.2


Murder Begins in the Heart (Matthew 5:21-26)


Anger itself is not necessarily sinful (cf. Eph. 4:26), but it is when generated for the wrong reason and/or expressed in the wrong way. Sinful anger leads to sinful actions, like murder, or sinful words, like hracá (Aramaic “empty head”) or moré (“fool”). The impulsive venting of hostility with hateful and insulting labels is what Jesus condemns. Although saying the English word “fool” is not inherently sinful (cf. Matt. 23:17), it is an English translation of Matthew’s Greek translation of Jesus’ Aramaic description of something irrationally spoken from a sinful heart – however that translates into English.

 

If a brother has something against you, you are responsible for trying to make it right (Matt. 5:23-24). If you have something against a brother, you are responsible for trying to make it right (Matt. 18:15).3


Adultery Begins in the Heart (Matthew 5:27-30)


Sexual sin stems from the premeditation of a lustful heart (cf. Matt. 15:19; Mark 7:21; 2 Pet. 2:14; also Acts 5:4; Job 31:1; Jer. 5:8). Jesus uses graphic imagery to stress the importance of ridding oneself of whatever leads to sin, and avoiding what he describes as géenna (Matt. 5:29-30). Plucking out the right eye and cutting off the right hand is hyperbolic, highlighting the seriousness of sin and its consequences. While the Grecized term géenna is rendered in most English versions as “hell,” it is derived from the Aramaic gēhannā and its Hebrew equivalent ge Hinnom, meaning “Valley of Hinnom.” Similar to picturing heaven with the most beautiful and precious things known to man (e.g., Rev. 21:11-21), the Lord portrays the destination of the wicked with imagery familiar to his listening audience. The most disgusting place imaginable was the rubbish dump outside of Jerusalem (the Valley of Hinnom), with decomposing carcasses and cadavers covered in maggots (“where their worm does not die”) and its perpetual smoldering (“and the fire is not quenched”) (see Mark 9:42-48).4


Divorce and Remarriage (Matthew 5:31-32)5


The current Jewish attitude toward divorce (succinctly stated in Matt. 5:31) had apparently become as lax as their attitude toward other moral issues discussed in this chapter. According to the Law of Moses, the death penalty could only be administered “on the testimony of two or three witnesses,” without which execution would be unlawful (Deut. 17:6-7; 19:15). In cases of adultery, the availability of two or three witnesses would have been so rare that divorce became an alternative (Deut. 24:1; cf. Matt. 1:19; 19:7-8).6


The term used in Matt. 5:32 to express the reason for the divorce is porneía, generally referencing any kind of “unlawful sexual intercourse” (BDAG 854). In the plural form it might be argued that this word “points out the various factors that may bring about sexual immorality” (ibid.), e.g., lust, fondling, licentiousness, etc., but in its singular form (as in Matt. 5:32; 19:9; etc.), it refers to the specific act of sexual intercourse.  

 

Being remarried to someone else following an unlawful divorce, Jesus says, “is committing adultery.” The verb moicháō (along with its noun form moicheía) is a specific kind of porneía, namely “adultery,” i.e., consensual sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than his or her legitimate spouse (cf. Lev. 18:20; 20:10; Deut. 22:22; Prov. 6:32; Matt. 5:28; John 8:3; Heb. 13:4). It follows that if a divorce occurs without divine sanction, God does not recognize the dissolution of the marriage, thus every time the unscripturally remarried couple engages in sex, they are committing the sexual sin of adultery.


A few chapters later Jesus is asked about the “cause” or “reason” for a lawful divorce, and he gives the same answer, reaffirming God’s intent from the beginning: one man and one woman for life (Matt. 19:3-6). He then contrasts the written Law of Moses (still subject to misinterpretation) with what “I say to you” (vv. 7-9). There are divorces the Lord does not sanction and remarriages the Lord does not sanction, and vice versa (cf. also Mark 10:1-12).


--Kevin L. Moore


Endnotes:

     1 Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are from the New King James Version (1996).

     2 The so-called Golden Rule (“do unto others ...”) is cited in the same discourse (Matt. 7:12), and just because it summarizes “the Law and the Prophets” does not mean it is no longer applicable as a fundamental principle in Christ’s new covenant system.

     3 See K. L. Moore, “Conflict Resolution (Part 1),” Moore Perspective (17 June 2026), <Link>, + accompanying Link (Part 2).

     4 See K. L. Moore, “One of the Worst Things About Hell,” Moore Perspective (9 Dec. 2012), <Link>.

     5 See K. L. Moore, “Divorce and Remarriage (Part 2),” Moore Perspective (7 May 2015), <Link>.

     6 In John 8:3-11 Jesus upheld the Law while the scribes and Pharisees were in violation of it. Both parties who were guilty of adultery (not just one) were to be punished (Deut. 22:22), but only on the testimony of two or three witnesses (Deut. 17:6), and the witnesses were to cast the first stones (Deut. 17:7). Without these legal requirements, neither Jesus nor anyone else could lawfully condemn her (to death). See K. L. Moore, “The Pericopae Adulterae,” Moore Perspective (12 Sept. 2018), <Link>.


Related Posts: Matthew 5:17-20, Sermon on the Mount: Part 1, Part 3

 

Image credit: https://faithequip.org/the-sermon-on-the-mount/