Showing posts with label false religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label false religion. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 July 2017

The Man of Lawlessness (Part 2 of 3): Description and Fate

     The descriptions of “the man of lawlessness” in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 readily fit into the genre of apocalyptic literature, which “needs to be recognized, along with the degree to which their literary medium has shaped the message they give” (J. D. G. Dunn, Theology of Paul 304-305).

The Man of Lawlessness Described

     The [one] opposing and exalting himself above every so-called god1 or object of worship, so as to sit down in the temple of God, setting forth himself that he is God” (2 Thess. 2:4).2 At the time of writing, “the man of lawlessness” was already at work. The word for “temple” here is ναός, which is not the whole temple but the innermost sanctuary, representing the presence of God (cf. Rev. 7:15; 11:1, 19; 15:8; 16:17; 21:22). False religion, in drawing people away from God and his church, essentially takes the place of God.
     Do you not remember that, still being with you, I said these things to you?” (2 Thess. 2:5). In the next verse and in 3:7 there are reminders of what these Christians already know, as noted multiple times in the previous correspondence (1 Thess. 1:5; 2:1, 2, 5, 11; 3:3, 4; 4:2; 5:2). Here, however, the rhetorical “do you not remember” is comparable to “do you not know,” serving as a mild rebuke. During the inaugural evangelistic campaign, the missionaries had done extensive teaching (1:10; 1 Thess. 1:5–2:13; 3:4; 4:2, 11), particularly Paul (cf. Acts 17:2-3). The imperfect active indicative form of the verb ἔλεγον (“I said”) indicates that he had repeatedly spoken of these things (cp. Acts 20:27-31).
     And now the [thing] restraining [τὸ κατέχον – neuter], you know, for him to be revealed in his time, for the mystery of the lawlessness is already working; the one restraining [μόνον ὁ κατέχων – masculine] now, until he might be [taken] out of [the] midst [‘out of the way,’ cf. Col. 2:14]” (2 Thess. 2:6-7). The ESV offers a smoother translation: “And you know what is restraining him now so that he may be revealed in his time. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Only he who now restrains it will do so until he is out of the way.” The adverb “now” [νῦν] indicates something current, of which the Thessalonians are presently aware. The verb κατέχω [to “restrain”] means to (a) hold back or detain; (b) hinder or restrain; (c) hold fast or keep secure; (d) possess or take possession of.
     Contextually, “the [thing] restraining” may simply be “the love of the truth” (vv. 10, 12) that keeps false religion at bay, and “the one restraining” characterizes the one who loves the truth (vv. 13-15; cf. 2 Tim. 3:17; also Matt. 12:35a; 1 Cor. 2:15), refusing to yield to the enticement of false religion. The word “mystery” [μυστήριον] is descriptive of the subtle and deceptive nature of false religion (cf. v. 10a; Eph. 4:14; 5:6; Col. 2:8; 1 John 2:26), while the phrase “of the lawlessness” reveals its actual nature, i.e., contrary to the law of God (cf. Matt. 7:21-23; 13:41; 23:28; 24:11-12; Rom. 2:12, 20-23; 7:22–8:8).
     The fact that this “is already working” indicates something happening at the time of writing (cf. Acts 20:27-31; Rom. 16:17-18; Jude 4; 1 John 2:26; 4:1, 3). After issuing a similar warning to the Ephesian elders, Paul commits them “to God and to the word of his grace” (Acts 20:29-32). What the Thessalonians “know,” having repeatedly been reminded, is that they have eagerly embraced the truth of God’s word (vv. 13-14; cf. 1 Thess. 1:5–2:13), “which also is working in you, the believing [ones]” (1 Thess. 2:13) as the restraining force against religious deception and corruption.

The Man of Lawlessness Destroyed

     And then the lawless [one] will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will destroy with the breath of his mouth, and will abolish by the appearing of his coming” (2 Thess. 2:8). The “lawless [one]” is clearly “the man of lawlessness” (v. 4), responsible for “the lawlessness” (v. 7). While many commentators maintain that the lawless figure will be revealed prior to the Lord’s return, this is an assumption not explicitly stated in the text. The restraining continues “until” [ἕως] the Lord’s return (vv. 6-7). Contextually the circumstances involve “the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ …. the day of the Lord” (2:1-2), at which time “the man of lawlessness is revealed” (2:3), viz. “in the revelation of the Lord Jesus” (1:7). In other words, all will be exposed as Christ returns, and those drawn into the deception of false religion will finally see the error to which they have allowed themselves to be blinded; see esp. 1 Thess. 2:14-16. From the revealing of “the lawless one,” the text immediately speaks of his destruction.
     False religion (personified) is doomed, “whom the Lord Jesus will destroy … and will abolish …” The principal character of the second coming is “the Lord Jesus” who executes the judgment (cf. 1:7; 1 Thess. 1:10; 4:16). The verb ἀναιρέω means to “take away, do away with, destroy” (BAGD 54-55), and the verb καταργέω means to “abolish, wipe out, set aside …. bring to an end” (BAGD 417). This will be accomplished “with the breath of his mouth [cp. Isa. 11:4] … by the appearing of his coming.” The apocalyptic imagery here reiterates 1:7b-8, “… in the revelation of the Lord Jesus from heaven with angels of his power, in a fire of flame inflicting vengeance on the [ones] not knowing God and the [ones] not obeying the gospel of our Lord Jesus.” False religion will be annihilated, and those entangled in it will face the Lord in judgment.
     Lest we get distracted by the fantastic descriptions of this extraordinary event, remember the original intent of the writing. G. Fee observes, “Everything about the passage suggests that Paul is here offering a word of encouragement to these persecuted believers, since the emphasis is now altogether on God’s ultimate, righteous judgment of their persecutors” (Thessalonians 290).

The Satanic Influence Behind the Deception

     The description continues: “of whom is coming according to [the] working of Satan in all power and signs and wonders of falsehood” (2 Thess. 2:9). The present tense, “is coming,” reaffirms that “the mystery of the lawlessness is already working” at the time of writing (v. 7) and is spawning “the apostasy” (v. 3). Readers are now informed that all this is “according to [the] working of Satan.” Satan has already been active, attempting to thwart this good work at Thessalonica and elsewhere (1 Thess. 2:18). He masquerades himself as an angel of light” (2 Cor. 11:14). He “has blinded the minds of the unbelieving [ones], lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, shines forth” (2 Cor. 4:4b). Unbelievers have allowed themselves to fall into “the snare of the devil, having been captured by him [to do] his will” (2 Tim. 2:26; cf. 1 Tim. 3:7; 6:9). Believers, on the other hand, who are open to and enlightened by the gospel, “are not ignorant of his schemes” (2 Cor. 2:11). Satan’s devious work is not limited to sorcery, black magic, satanic cults, and pagan idolatry. He is behind every form of false religion, including so-called “Christian” movements that deviate from the narrow path of truth (cf. Matt. 7:13-23; 2 Pet. 2:1-2, 18-22; etc.).
     The “power and signs and wonders” are not genuine miracles, like those confirming divine teaching (cf. Mark 16:20; John 2:23; 3:2; Acts 14:3; Heb. 2:3-4). Rather, these are “of falsehood,” i.e. “false miracles, signs, and wonders” (CSB), cf. Matt. 24:11, 24; Acts 8:9-11; 13:6; 19:13-16, 19; Rev. 13:13. Myths, legends, superstitions, amulets, relics, shrines, mysteries of the occult, and numerous elaborate claims have been propagated by false religion throughout history.
     We read further, “and in every deceit of unrighteousness [to] the ones perishing, which instead they did not accept the love of the truth for them to be saved” (2 Thess. 2:10). The “every deceit” is the result of the aforementioned “falsehood” (v. 9; cf. v. 3). Linking this passage to the earlier discussion in 1:5-9 is another word with the δικ- root, viz. ἀδικία (“unrighteousness”). The judgment of God is “just” or “righteous” [δίκαιος] (1:5, 6) in taking “vengeance” [ἐκδίκησις] (1:8) and meting out the “penalty” [δίκη] (1:9) because of “unrighteousness” [ἀδικία] (2:10). Those deceived by unrighteousness are “the ones perishing,” the same who consider the message of the cross foolish, in contrast to the ones being saved who regard the same message as the power of God (1 Cor. 1:18; cf. 2 Cor. 2:15; Rom. 1:16).3
     The reason for judgment is that “they did not accept [‘receive,’ ‘welcome’] the love of the truth …” This is in stark contrast to the Thessalonian Christians, “having received the word …” (1 Thess. 1:6); “you accepted … [the] word of God …” (1 Thess. 2:13). Refusing to welcome and love the truth is a rejection of what God requires “for them to be saved,” i.e., saved from divine wrath and everlasting destruction (1:6-9; cf. 1 Thess. 1:10; 2:16).
--Kevin L. Moore

Endnotes:
     1 Should θεός here be rendered “god” (CSB, ESV, ISV, NASB, NET, NLT, N/RSV) or “God” (ASV, N/KJV, NIV)?
     2 Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are the author’s own translation.
     3 In 2 Cor. 4:3, we read: “But even if our gospel [preached by Paul, Silvanus, and Timothy, 1:19; cf. 1 Thess. 1:5; 2 Thess. 2:14] is veiled [‘covered,’ ‘concealed’], it is veiled in those [who are] perishing.” Not everyone understands, appreciates, or amenably responds to the preaching of the gospel, viz. “those perishing,” whose prejudices and predispositions render them incapable of receptivity, unwilling to understand and obey, leading to their spiritual demise (cf. 2 Cor. 3:14-15; 1 Cor. 1:18, 23; 2:14; also Rom. 8:5-8).


Image credit: https://kenanmalik.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/religion-praying.jpg

Wednesday, 12 July 2017

The Man of Lawlessness (Part 1 of 3): Identification

     The return of Christ, the great apostasy, the man of lawlessness, and the strong delusion are all spoken of in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12. What does it all mean? The late British scholar William Neil regarded this text as “one of the most difficult passages in all the epistles …”1 Dr. Todd D. Still comments, “This passage is perhaps the most perplexing (and peculiar) in the Pauline letter corpus, laden as it is with interpretive conundrums.”2

Preliminary considerations

     Before this text says anything to me (or to anyone else in the 21st century), it has already spoken to those to whom it was originally addressed. If my interpretation of it has little or no relevance for the mid-first-century Thessalonian church, I have probably missed the point. Much of this information had already been communicated to these believers (2 Thess. 1:10; 2:5-6), so Paul, Silvanus, and Timothy could take for granted that certain details would already be known without having to be repeated. Therefore, we should not try to force precision of meaning that is not there, and avoid unnecessary speculation. It goes without saying that whatever conclusions are drawn must be in harmony with everything else revealed in the biblical record.

False Reports About the Day of the Lord

     But we are asking you, brothers, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and our gathering together unto him, for you not to be quickly shaken in mind, nor to be troubled on account of a spirit, or on account of a word, or on account of a letter, as if from us, as if the day of the Lord has come” (2 Thess. 2:1-2).3 The return of Christ is a prominent theme in both 1 and 2 Thessalonians.4 By the time the second letter was written, previous teaching appears to have been misconstrued, and Paul and his companions are wondering about where the misinformation came from. Apparently there was an element in the church espousing some form of realized eschatology (cf. 2 Tim. 2:17-18), but the Thessalonian Christians had been taught a future eschatology. The day of the Lord is to be sudden and unexpected (1 Thess. 5:1-6), so for anyone to say it is already here is perplexing and disconcerting.
     No one should deceive you in any way, because [it will not be] unless the apostasy come first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction” (2 Thess. 2:3). Speaking of ἡ ἀποστασία the apostasy” (CSB, NASB), “the rebellion” (ESV, ISV, NIV), “the falling away” (ASV, NKJV) suggests that the Thessalonians have already been informed about it, thus no further explanation is needed or given. The expression refers to “a departure from truth previously accepted … involves the breaking of a professed relationship with God.”5 This apostasy is to occur sometime between the time of writing and the return of Christ.
     If it were important enough for Paul to have repeatedly spoken [ἔλεγον – imperfect active indicative] of these things (2 Thess. 2:5), surely the same teachings were provided to other congregations (cp. 1 Thess. 5:27; 1 Cor. 4:17; 7:17; 11:16; 14:33). About five years later, the apostle reminds the Ephesian church leaders of what he had invested three years, night and day with tears, constantly warning about, viz., “… grievous wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock, and from your own selves men will arise speaking corrupt things to drag away the disciples after them” (Acts 20:27-31). In view of the fact that similar warnings are issued throughout the NT, the same occasion – a major falling away from the faith – must be in view (cf. Matt. 7:13-23; 13:15; 25:31-46; Rom. 16:17-18; Eph. 4:14; 1 Tim. 4:1-4; 2 Pet. 2:1-2, 18-22; Jude 4; 1 John 4:1; Rev. 2:5; 3:16).
     The apostasy will have “come” in conjunction with “the man of lawlessness” who is to be “revealed.6 This enigmatic figure is also called “the son of destruction,” the same description applied to Judas Iscariot in John 17:12, indicative of a comparable fate, demeanor, or destructive behavior. In the ancient East the word “son” was often used to describe one’s character, disposition, nature, or conduct.7 The noun ἀπώλεια [“destruction”] refers either to the “destruction” or “waste” one causes, or to the “destruction,” “annihilation,” or “ruin” one experiences (BAGD 103), and it is possible that both nuances are intended here.

Identifying the Man of Lawlessness

     A number of commentators focus attention almost exclusively on an actual, historical person believed to be a recognizable leader of a great rebellion against God. However, any consensus on the identity of this mysterious character remains hopelessly aloof. Proposals have included Nero, Domitian, Genseric the Vandal, Mohammed, Pope John XII, Martin Luther, Napoleon, Hitler, Mussolini, ad infinitum. But identifying this figure as a single person in the events of history is untenable, since the man of lawlessness is to be present at the end of the world (v. 8) and his work had already started at the time of writing (v. 7). Among the more popular suggestions of modern exegetes are (a) the Antichrist, who attempts to destroy the work of Christ in the last days; (b) Satan; (c) the Roman emperor; (d) the Jewish high priest; (e) militant Jewish zealots; (f) the Roman Catholic papacy; (g) evil personified.
     I propose that instead of a specific person, “the man of lawlessness” is a representative figure epitomizing false religion. This would include anyone who happens to be leading such a movement, but the application is broader. It cannot be limited to just one individual or a single heretical group but is a personification of false religion in general.8
     When, for example, Paul affirms that scripture is profitable for “the man of God” (2 Tim. 3:17), is he speaking of only one person, or is he referring, in a representative way, to all people of God who benefit from scripture? Jesus said, “the good man out of his good treasure produces good things, and the evil man out of his evil treasure produces evil things” (Matt. 12:35; Luke 6:45). Does this mean there is only one “good man” and only one “evil man,” or do these figures characterize everyone in each category? When Paul speaks of “the blessedness of the man to whom God accounts righteousness apart from works” (Rom. 4:6), which man? See also Isa. 55:7; Matt. 4:4; 15:11; 18:7b; 21:28-32; Luke 4:4; John 2:25; Rom. 10:5; 14:20; 1 Cor. 2:14-15; Gal. 3:12; Eph. 4:13, 22, 24; Col. 3:9; Jas. 1:6-7.
     Any movement (or false teaching or false teacher) influencing and contributing to Christians being drawn away from the true faith is “the man of lawlessness.” This would apply to the Roman Imperial Cult (inclusive of emperor worship, cf. Rev. 13), Anti-Christian Judaism (cf. Heb. 10), Gnosticism (cf. 2 John 7), Islam, Roman Catholicism, denominationalism, various other world religions and cults, secularism, et al. Since “the man of lawlessness” is to be present at the time of the Lord’s return (v. 8), and his work (the great apostasy) was already starting in the first century (vv. 3, 7), false religion personified is a viable interpretation.
--Kevin L. Moore

Endnotes:
     1 William Neil, The Epistle of Paul to the Thessalonians (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1950): 155.
     2 Todd D. Still, “Eschatology in the Thessalonian Letters,” RevExp 96 (1999): 200.
     3 Unless otherwise noted, scripture quotations are the author’s own translation. The Byzantine Majority Text reads “the day of Christ” in v. 2, while the NA28/UBS5 text reads “the day of the Lord.”
     4 1 Thess. 1:10; 2:19; 3:13; 4:15, 17; 5:2, 4, 10, 23; 2 Thess. 1:7-10.
     5 C. C. Ryrie, “Apostasy in the Church,” BibSac 121:481 (1964): 154-62.
     6 The aorist tense of “come” [ἔλθῃ] and “revealed” [ἀποκαλυφθῇ] “represents an activity as a total action, in its entirety without dwelling on its internal details” (K. L. McKay, “Aspect” 203-204). The text does not affirm that each occurs at the same moment in time. The two are certainly interrelated and overlap, irrespective of historical positioning. The Byzantine Majority Text reads ὁ ἄνθρωπος τῆς ἁμαρτίας (“the man of sin”), while the NA28/UBS5 text reads ὁ ἄνθρωπος τῆς ἀνομίας (“the man of lawlessness”). In favor of the latter reading, L. Morris reasons that because of Paul’s infrequent use of ἀνομία, copyists would be less likely to change the more common ἁμαρτία [“sin”] to ἀνομία [“lawlessness”] than vice versa (Thessalonians 219 n. 22). B. M. Metzger reasons further that γὰρ … ἀνομίας in v. 7 “seems to presuppose ἀνομίας here” (Textual Commentary [2nd ed.] 567).
     7 For example, “sons of Belial” (Judg. 19:22; 1 Sam. 2:12), “sons of might” (Psa. 29:1; 89:6), “son of wickedness” (Psa. 89:22), “sons of the sorceress” (Isa. 57:3), “sons of thunder” (Mark 3:17), “sons of this world” (Luke 16:8), “sons of light” (John 12:36; Eph. 5:8; 1 Thess. 5:5), and “son of encouragement” (Acts 4:36).
     8 Personification is a common rhetorical device. N.B., e.g., wisdom (Prov. 1:20; 3:13-15; 9:1), the land (Joel 1:10), the nation of Israel (Jer. 31:4, 18), NT Christians (2 Cor. 11:2; Eph. 4:13), riches (Matt. 6:24), sin (John 8:24; Rom. 6:16), death (Rev. 6:8), et al.


Image credit: http://cdn.playbuzz.com/cdn/d41c0768-95bb-4521-b5ff-7803fd740a6f/5c54183a-c0e7-4422-8af5-ad4d144a9ce5.jpg