Showing posts with label psallo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psallo. Show all posts

Saturday, 7 September 2013

Questions About Music in Christian Worship (Part 3 of 3)


Q: Isn’t singing without mechanical instruments just a “Church of Christ” tradition?
         The word “tradition” simply refers to something that is passed down, whether from God to man through His word (1 Cor. 11:2, 23) or from man to man through subjective preferences (Matt. 15:1-9). Is singing praises to God without musical accompaniment, as practiced by modern-day churches of Christ, based on biblical tradition or human tradition? Singing without musical instruments in Christian worship can be traced back to the NT itself, continuing on through the first several hundred years of church history. Singing with musical accompaniment in Christian worship can only be traced back to the Roman Catholic Church no earlier than the 7th-century AD and to Protestant denominations of the 19th-century AD. Which practice is based on human tradition?
Q: Does the Greek word psallô in Eph. 5:19 mean to pluck the strings of an instrument?
     If it does, then every Christian is required to play a stringed instrument while singing -- an assertion no one will make. The meaning of the Greek word psallô has undergone a number of changes through the centuries. Long before the NT was written, psallô meant “to pluck off” or “pull out,” e.g. the hair (J. H. Thayer, Greek-English Lexicon 675). Then it came to signify “to cause to vibrate by touching, to twang,” e.g. a carpenter’s line; then “to touch or strike the chord, to twang the strings,” e.g. of a stringed instrument (ibid.). What should concern us, however, is the meaning of psallô when the NT was written. Thayer says, “in the N.T. to sing a hymn, to celebrate the praises of God in song” (ibid.). After noting the original non-musical sense of the word, the Greek-English Lexicon of Bauer, Arndt, Gingrich and Danker has this to say: “In the LXX [Greek translation of the OT] ps[allô] freq. means ‘sing’, whether to the accompaniment of a harp or (as usually) not . . . . This process continued until ps[allô] in Mod. Gk. means ‘sing’ exclusively; cf. psaltês = singer, chanter, w[ith] no ref[erence] to instrumental accompaniment” (891). When Paul wrote Rom. 15:9, 1 Cor. 14:15, and Eph. 5:19, and when James wrote Jas. 5:13, the word psallô simply meant to “sing, sing praise” (ibid.). Moreover, even if the word psallô still carried the idea of “pluck,” “strike,” or “twang,” the NT never uses “on stringed instruments” as the object of this verb, but rather “in/with your heart” (Eph. 5:19). The instrument with which Christians are enjoined to “make melody” (psallô), while singing in worship, is the God-created human heart, not a man-made mechanical instrument.
Q: Does 2 Chronicles 29:25 indicate that the use of musical instruments in worship was according to divine decree?
     Even if it does, remember this pronouncement was enjoined on ancient Israel and has nothing to do with Christian activity. Nevertheless, what does this passage actually say? “Then he [Hezekiah] stationed the Levites in the house of the Lord with cymbals, with stringed instruments, and with harps, according to the commandment of David, of Gad the king’s seer, and of Nathan the prophet; for thus was the commandment of the Lord by his prophets.” Notice that there are two actions being considered for which there were two different commands: (1) the Levites stationed in the temple was according to the commandment of the Lord (cf. Deut. 10:8); (2) the use of musical instruments was according to the commandment of David and his cohorts (cf. 1 Chron. 15:16; 23:5). Whether or not the latter was done with divine approval is a moot point as far as NT Christians are concerned. However, the Lord’s condemnation of Israel’s luxury and revelry in Amos 6:1-5 included their use of musical instruments “like David,” bringing into question the Lord’s supposed sanction of this practice.
--Kevin L. Moore

Related posts: Music & the Bible HistoryQuestions About Music 1Questions About Music 2

Image credit: http://saviochs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/music-clipartMUSIC1.jpg

Saturday, 24 August 2013

Questions About Music in Christian Worship (Part 1 of 3)




Q: Doesn’t the Bible tell us to praise God with various instruments of music? (Psalm 149:3; 150:3-5; etc.)
     The OT book of Psalms is set in a pre-Christian, Jewish context (cf. 14:7; 20:1-3; 147:19; etc.). As a matter of fact, it was part of Israel’s law. In John 10:34 and 15:25 Jesus quoted from the book of Psalms (viz. 82:6; 69:4) and included it in the Jewish “law.” Not only do we find musical instruments in the book of Psalms, but also animal sacrifices (20:3; 50:5, 8; 66:13-15), Levitical priests (132:9), the ark of the covenant (132:8), dancing (149:3; 150:4), and pleas for retributive justice (5:10; 10:15). Consistency demands that if musical instruments are borrowed from the Psalms, these other Jewish items must be taken as well. But Paul says concerning this law: “For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.’ But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident ...” (Gal. 3:10-11 NKJV). To illustrate that the book of Psalms does not provide a pattern for Christian activity, compare what David wrote in Psa. 18:37-40 with what Jesus taught in Matt. 5:43-48. (NB: The recording of a statement or event is not equivalent to sanctioning it. We can learn from and be edified by the basic principles in the Psalms [Rom. 15:4] without adopting Jewish conventions). The pattern for Christian worship is the new covenant of Jesus Christ, not the book of Psalms or any other part of the old Jewish law.  
Q: Since Christians are to sing “psalms” (Eph. 5:19; Jas. 5:13), and psalms are set to music, wouldn’t this suggest that Christian singing is to be accompanied by instrumental music?
     A psalm (Greek psalmos) is simply a poetic verse that can be read, quoted, or sung. While it is possible for a psalm to be set to music and sung with musical accompaniment, the music itself is supplementary to, not inherent in, the psalm. A psalm is comprised of words. Words cannot be played on an instrument, therefore a psalm that is set to music is designed to be sung, irrespective of any potential accompaniment. Incidentally, most of the OT psalms that were set to music were simply sung with no added musical consort (cf. Psa. 7:17; 9:11; 30:4, 12; 57:9; 59:16-17; 66:1-8; 101:1; et al.). When “psalms” are mentioned in the NT as part of worship, Christians are never directed to “play” them. Rather, the instructions specify “speaking,” “teaching,” “admonishing,” “singing,” and “making melody in your heart.”
Q: Do the harps in heaven (Rev. 5:8; 14:2; 15:2) make mechanical instrumental music in Christian worship acceptable on earth?
     The book of Revelation is a highly symbolic book, and many of the symbols were borrowed from the Old Testament. A symbol is something that stands for or represents another thing. For example, “horns” (Rev. 5:6; 12:3; 17:12) represent power or strength (cf. Psa. 75:10; 92:10), “locusts” (Rev. 9:3, 7) are symbols of destruction and devastation (cf. Ex. 10:4-6; Isa. 33:4), “Babylon” (Rev. 16:19; 17:5; 18:2) stands for the oppressors of God’s people (cf. 2 Kgs. 25:21; Dan. 1:1), "trumpets" (Rev. 1:10; 4:1; 8:13; 9:14) symbolize a call to attention or warning of judgment (cf. Josh. 6:5; Neh. 4:20; Jer. 4:19; 6:1; Ezek. 33:3), etc. To take one of these symbols literally to justify a particular modern-day practice is to stretch these passages beyond their intended meaning.
     In Rev. 5:8 “the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each having a harp, and golden bowls full of incense ...” The harp figure evokes the thought of a beautiful sound (cf. 1 Sam. 16:23), and the golden bowls of incense suggest a pleasing aroma (cf. Psa. 141:2). But what do these symbols represent? The text goes on to explain, “... which are the prayers of the saints.” When prayers are offered to the Lord, without the use of a literal harp or golden bowls of incense, the prayers themselves are like a beautiful sound and a pleasing aroma to the Lord. 
     In Rev. 14:2 John heard something coming from heaven. Although the Greek word phônên means “voice” (NKJV), it can also be translated “sound” (NIV). Three times in this verse the Greek word hôs (“like” or “as”) is used as John likens what he heard to the following things: (a) it was like the sound of many waters; (b) it was like the sound of loud thunder, (c) it was like the sound of harpists playing their harps. Since descriptive symbols are clearly being used, the supposed “harp playing” is no more literal than the Lamb, Mount Zion, the 144,000 male virgins, the waters, the thunder, or any other symbol used in this chapter. The voice John heard was powerful (like many waters), and loud (like thunder), and beautiful (like harpists playing their harps). And what were the 144,000 male virgins doing? Not keeping company with a literal baby sheep or splashing in water or generating thunder or plucking harp strings. “And they sang a new song ...” (v. 3). 
     The “harps” in Rev. 15:2 are not being strummed as an offering of worship. In this highly figurative scene the “harps of God” simply represent the jubilation and triumph of God’s people in view of the harsh judgment against their enemies (cf. 2 Chron. 20:27-28; Neh. 12:27; also Job 30:31; Psa. 137:1-2).
     Furthermore, whatever might be going on in heaven does not set a precedent for human activity on earth. For example, the fact that there is no marriage in heaven (Matt. 22:30) has no bearing on the Christian in this present life. Every verse in the NT that pertains to music in Christian worship clearly specifies vocal praise.
--Kevin L. Moore

Related posts: Music & the Bible HistoryQuestions About Music 2Questions About Music 3

Image credit: http://mustech.pbworks.com/f/1329421488/music.jpg